To meet a requirement for a heavy escort fighter, or TIS (Tyazhely istrebitel soprovozhdeniya), formulated in the autumn of 1938, the Polikarpov OKB designed a low-wing monoplane of all-metal construction powered by two 1,400hp Mikulin AM-37 engines. Fixed forward-firing armament comprised four 7.62mm and two 20mm guns, rear protection being provided by single flexible 7.62mm guns fired from dorsal and ventral positions by the second crew member. The first prototype, Samolet A, was flown in September 1941, but evacuation of the Polikarpov facilities to Novosibirsk delayed the programme, and an improved second prototype, Samolet MA, was not flown until 13 June 1944. The MA was intended to be powered by 1,700hp Mikulin AM-39 engines, but their non-availability dictated installation of 1,665hp AM-38 engines. Fixed forward-firing armament was changed to two 37mm cannon and two 12.7mm machine guns. The flight testing of the MA was in its early stages when, on 30 July 1944, Polikarpov died and his OKB was almost immediately disbanded, the TIS programme being abandoned.
Max take-off weight: 7840 kg / 17284 lb Empty weight: 5800 kg / 12787 lb Wingspan: 15.50 m / 51 ft 10 in Length: 11.70 m / 38 ft 5 in Height: 4.35 m / 14 ft 3 in Wing area: 34.85 sq.m / 375.12 sq ft Max. speed: 555 km/h / 345 mph Range: 1070 km / 665 miles
In 1941, the Polikarpov OKB began work on an Istrebitel’ Tyazhely Pushechny – heavy cannon fighter – which was to mount a 37mm cannon between the cylinder banks of a 1,650hp Klimov M-107P 12- cylinder liquid-cooled Vee engine, and also carry two synchronised 20mm cannon. The aircraft was of mixed construction, the fuselage being a wooden monocoque and the wing of steel and dural. The first prototype, referred to as the M-1, was completed in October 1941, but difficulties with the engine delayed the initiation of flight testing until 23 February 1942. An M-107A replaced the M-107P late in 1942, but engine difficulties were still experienced, and a second prototype, the M-2, was completed with an AM-37 engine of 1,400hp with which it flew on 23 November 1943. The M-2 had an armament of three 20mm cannon and eight RS-82 unguided rocket projectiles, the engine eventually being replaced by an AM-39 of 1,700hp. Factory flight testing continued until June 1944 when the programme was abandoned.
M-1 Max take-off weight: 3570 kg / 7871 lb Empty weight: 2960 kg / 6526 lb Wingspan: 10.00 m / 33 ft 10 in Length: 8.95 m / 29 ft 4 in Wing area: 16.45 sq.m / 177.07 sq ft Max. speed: 655 km/h / 407 mph Range: 1280 km / 795 miles
Acceptance that the concept of the I-180 was outmoded coupled with the prospect of the availability of powerful 18-cylinder radial engines led the Polikarpov OKB to design the I-185 within an extraordinarily short period of time (25 January to 10 March 1940). Intended for the 1,750hp Shvetsov M-90 engine, the I-185 was of mixed construction, having a wooden monocoque fuselage mated with metal wings featuring automatic leadingedge slats a la Bf 109. Armament consisted of twin 12.7mm and twin 7.62mm guns, all fuselage-mounted. Development delays with the M-90 – which, by December 1940, was cleared only for restricted flight testing – resulted in dismantling of the first prototype unflown, this having been known as Samolet (Aircraft) R.
A second prototype. Samolet RM, was completed with a Shvetsov M-81 18-cylinder two-row radial and a ducted propeller spinner. This was flown on 11 January 1941, but the M-81 was found to develop insufficient power and was replaced by the Shvetsov M-71 of 1,900hp in May 1941. A third prototype, Samolet I, was completed with a 14-cylinder Shvetsov M-82 engine rated at 1,330hp (later 1,400hp), the fuselage being lengthened for CG reasons from 7.68m to 8.10m, and fuselage-mounted armament being changed to three 20mm cannon. State Acceptance Tests were conducted successfully between 13 April and 5 July 1942. A fourth prototype reverted to the M-71 engine and this underwent operational evaluation on the Kalinin Front alongside Samolet I. A redesigned wing (of single- in place of two-spar construction) was featured by this aircraft, which was tested with both the four-machine gun and three-cannon armament arrangements. A pre-production prototype, the so-called I-185 Etalon (Standard), was flown on 10 June 1942. Regarded as the forerunner of the intended production derivative, the I-186, this standardised on the M-71 engine and three-cannon armament, and had a similarly lengthened fuselage to that of Samolet I. State Acceptance Testing was conducted between November 1942 and January 1943, the NIl VVS evaluation reports describing the I-185 Etalon as “superior to all contemporary fighters.” In the event, it was found impracticable to manufacture the M-71 in large numbers and airframe production capacity was unavailable.
Max take-off weight: 3735 kg / 8234 lb Empty weight: 3130 kg / 6901 lb Wingspan: 9.80 m / 32 ft 2 in Length: 8.05 m / 26 ft 5 in Wing area: 15.53 sq.m / 167.16 sq ft Max. speed: 680 km/h / 423 mph
The preliminary design for the I-165 fighter was created in late 1937 and became the basis for the I-180 project design in March 1938. It was supposed to become a further evolution of the I-16 fighter with a slightly increased size and the M-88 engine. Developed by Dmitrii L Tomashevich (one of Polikarpov’s deputies), the I-180 was originally conceived with an all-metal structure. Limited all-metal construction experience, however, led the Polikarpov OKB to adopt an essentially similar structure to that of the earlier I-16, with a wooden monocoque fuselage and a fabric-skinned metal wing.
The machine took final form in its third prototype, and the first prototype was constructed in summer 1938. The first prototype, the I-180.1, was powered by a 1,100hp Tumansky M-88 14-cylinder two-row radial, intended armament being four 7.62mm guns. This aircraft was lost as a result of engine failure during its first flight on 15 December 1938 piloted by Valeriy Chkalov. Chkalov did not survive the accident. The second prototype, the I-180.2, differed primarily in having a 1,000hp Tumansky M-87A (later M-87B) 14-cylinder two-row radial and lengthened wing outer panels. These increased wing span from 9.00m to 10.05m and area from 14.68sq.m to 16.11sq.m. First flown on 19 April 1939, the I-180.2 was lost on its 53rd flight and the demise of another test pilot, Tomas Suzy.
Construction of the third prototype was started in mid-1939, the I-180.3 flown on 10 February 1940 with E. Ulyakhin as a test pilot, and featured a redesigned and more advanced wing structure, a 1,100hp M-88R engine, a cockpit canopy and an armament of two 12.7mm and two 7.62mm guns concentrated in the fuselage.
The I-180-3 was powered by an air-cooled M-88 engine that was not yet finished and proved to be quite problematic at the time of the aircraft’s testing. The motor passed the government testing only in December 1940, after the destiny of the I-180 project had already been decided. The aircraft strongly resembled the I-16 in its behaviour in the air, but had advantages over its predecessor in higher speed and faster climb times. It was also easier to control and more stable in manoeuvres, as well as during landing and take-off. Among the main drawbacks of the project were the lack of a canopy, various mechanical defects and poor plane surface finishing. Flown with both wheel and ski undercarriages, a lot of problems were fixed eventually but, on 6 July 1940 the third prototype was lost due to a pilot error accident during State Acceptance Trials.
In the meantime, a pre-series of 10 aircraft based on the I-180.2 had been under construction as the I-180S (Seriyny or Series), the first three of these having been completed in December 1939. Several I-180S machines took part in a May Day parade in Moscow. The I-180S was powered by the M-88R and carried an armament of two 12.7mm and two 7.62mm fuselage-mounted guns, and, like the I-180.3, featured an enclosed cockpit. The I-180S was cleared for service trials, but the results of these were academic as this fighter had been overtaken by the more advanced I-185.
As a part of the I-185 development programme, one pre-series I-180S fighter had the dated triangulated pattern mainwheel legs replaced with legs of cantilever type, this aircraft being referred to as the I-180Sh, the suffix indicating Shassi (chassis). In the event, it was not completed and flown.
A plethora of issues with the aircraft caused the work on its preparation for production to be stopped in late 1940 and the entire I-180 programme abandoned.
Max take-off weight: 2456 kg / 5415 lb Empty weight: 2046 kg / 4511 lb Wingspan: 10.09 m / 33 ft 1 in Length: 6.88 m / 23 ft 7 in Wing area: 16.11 sq.m / 173.41 sq ft Max. speed: 585 km/h / 364 mph
The first reference to a Polikarpov twin-engine model capable of executing bomber actions comes from the first half of 1936. This sketch would originally receive the name VT or Vozduzhni Tank (Flying Tank), which would later become MPI (Mnogomiestni Puchechni Isterbitiel or Multiseat Gunship Fighter) and SVB (Samoliot Vozduzhnovo Buoy or Air Combat Plane).
At the beginning of February, at one of the government meetings, Polikarpov learned that the OKB-2 collective, under the direction of Shpitalni, had developed a powerful 37 mm automatic cannon with a high muzzle velocity. Unfortunately, this weapon had not been tested due to the absence of an aircraft capable of using it.
In turn, Polikarpov reported that his group had developed a development of the TsKB-44 model with excellent technical specifications that could be ideally used as an aerial gunship intended to combat armored formations.
In this way, the idea of creating the new model according to Shpitalni himself constituted “…the synthesis of the achievements of the OKB-2 in automatic weapons, Polikarpov ‘s research in aviation aerodynamics and Polikarpov’s group of colleagues in the direction of automatic weapons”.
Shortly after this meeting, at Factory No.39 Polikarpov would develop three versions of the new aircraft that Polikarpov began to call VIT (Vozduzhni Isterbitiel Tankov or Aerial Tank Fighter (Russian: Поликарпов ВИТ-1)). Unfortunately, Factory No.39 soon began producing the DB-3 bomber and Polikarpov with his group was transferred to Factory No.21. This fact, together with the non-inclusion of these works in the experimental construction plan, led to the closure of work on the VIT as of July 5, 1936.
Faced with this situation, Shpitalni, at the beginning of 1936, sent a document to the secretary of the STO before the SNK USSR, GD Basilievich, in which he requested authorization to build the new VIT model in Factory No.22. This document was accompanied by M-100- powered and M-34FRN- powered VIT variants. The conceptual ideas were signed by Locev (drawings), Sigayev (brigade head) and Polikarpov (constructor). The designs were also signed by Shpitalni.
This model was presented as an all-metal monoplane with a low wing and a twin-engine power plant, with excellent aerodynamic shapes. On both sides of the fuselage were located the two 37 mm cannons with a total reserve of 100 projectiles. The magazines with 5 projectiles each were located in an elevator powered by an electrical system.
In the bow area, in front of the pilot, there was a fixed 20 mm ShVAK cannon with 100 – 200 projectiles and a belt feed. A ShKAS machine gun with 540 rounds was located in the gunner’s cabin to defend the rear hemisphere. This machine gun was installed on a mobile mount that guaranteed firing to the right or left.
The gunner’s cockpit had a glass cover that could be raised above the fuselage, which guaranteed a shooting angle of 65º upwards, 15º downwards and 45º horizontally to the sides.
The model was capable of carrying 200 kg (2 FAB-100 or 20 AO-10 bombs). In case of elimination of the 37 mm guns, the bomb load reached 1000 kg (2 FAB-500 or 4 FAB-250).
In the descriptive memory it was explained: “ – To judge the power of this aircraft it is enough to say, for example, that only the power of the weapons installed in the nose exceeds by more than 10 times the firepower of the most powerful fighter in service with our VVS. … To date, neither in the USSR nor in foreign armies there is a combat vehicle designed for active action against large groups of tanks. “This task is solved by our aerial tank fighter (VIT).”
The reaction to this Shpitalni document was instantaneous. State funding was provided and a resolution was prepared to include the model in the experimental construction plan.
On the other hand, the basis for production in Factory No.22 was not delivered. In its place for the development of the VIT at the end of August 1936 Factory No.84 in Khimki was made available. This factory, formerly part of the civil aviation scheme, had outdated equipment and lacked qualified personnel. Under these conditions, construction work on Polikarpov ‘s two-seat anti-tank aircraft began.
Unfortunately, the idea of this type of aircraft did not find the necessary support within military circles at that time.
It is noteworthy that from its conception the VIT was conceived as a technological demonstrator designed to study construction and technological methods. On its basis, a family of seven aircraft models with different tasks would be developed, capable of sharing a large percentage of common elements. This family included:
– Fast medium bomber with capacity for 800 kg of bombs inside the fuselage;
– Dive bomber with 900 kg of bombs on external supports;
– Long-range reconnaissance aircraft with a powerful armament of 4 20 mm cannons;
– Ground attack aircraft armed with six cannons, two machine guns and 300 kg of bombs;
– Fighter for large ground targets with two K-37 guns and two ShVAK;
– Escort aircraft for heavy bombers;
– Naval aircraft with floats with torpedo boat capacity.
By the end of 1936, the plans for the SVB version (Skorostnoi Visotni Bombardirovchik or High Altitude Fast Bomber) were practically finished. The word “visotni” represented a trend of the time, but in reality the model lacked a sealed cabin and turbochargers for high-altitude operations. In practice it was simply a high-speed medium bomber.
Based on this model, the plans for the model armed with VIT-1 2M-103 cannons would be developed. It is noteworthy that the “VIT” stamp appears on most of the SVB plans, but in that same period new plans were designed for the new model.
As weapons for destroying tanks, the use of two 37 mm ShFK-37 cannons of the OKB-15 NKV (as the Shpitalni construction bureau was now called) located in the wing roots was maintained. The name of these guns comes from the acronym Shpitalnovo Fyuselyazhno-krylevaya Pushka or Shpitalni Wing and Fuselage Gun.
Polikarpov presented the design of the aircraft in two variants: multiseat gunfighter or MPI and anti-tank aircraft or VIT. On January 31, 1937 the evaluation commission reviewed the model of the MPI-1 version with two M-103 engines and on July 25, by government decision, the experimental construction plan was approved for the current year in which it was considered. the construction of two examples of the multiseat gunfighter with two M-103 960 hp engines with a maximum flight speed of 500 – 550 km at an altitude of 5000 meters.
The VIT-1 was designed as a low-wing two-seat monoplane with beautiful aerodynamic shapes and smooth skin on a thin fuselage. The landing gear was of a retractable type and a monoplane tail with a single empennage.
The fuselage, built entirely of metal, had an oval cross section. The construction was semi-monocoque.
The central section constituted a combination of closed duralumin profiles and skeletal structures of welded steel tubes.
The wing, with a double spar, had a trapezoidal shape in the plane with rounded ends and ended at the junction with the fuselage, presenting the characteristic extensions of many Polikarpov models. The wing profile used was the Clark Y with a relative thickness of 14% at the root and 6.35% at the ends.
The wing spars were constructed of welded chrome-molybdenum steel tubes. The ribs were built with duralumin profiles, except for the engine area, where they were replaced by welded steel tubes. The ailerons featured aerodynamic and weight compensation.
The tail section was all metal. The stabilizer was fixed to the fuselage structure. The empennage was constructed of duralumin.
The entire cell was calculated according to resistance standards for fighters, supporting overloads of up to 13g.
The landing gear was of the conventional tailwheel type. The landers with the wheels were retracted backwards, inserting into the lower area of the power nacelles. The retraction system was pneumatic. The main wheels had brakes. The tail wheel was not retractable.
The 860 hp M-103 engines were selected as the power plant. The composition of the cooling radiators was somewhat unusual for a twin-engine aircraft. The radiators were located in retractable structures equipped with tunnels for the entry of air. These structures were located on the wing extrados on the outer sides of the power nacelles and depending on the flight regime, they extended or were practically hidden in the wing. Control was carried out with the help of a thermostat.
The VIT-1’s armament was the most powerful installed on any Soviet fighter up to that time and consisted of two 37 mm ShFK-37 cannons located in the wing roots.
The defensive armament consisted of a TUR-10 turret with a ShKAS machine gun on the rear fuselage, which would later be replaced by one of the SUDB-3 type, similar to that used in the Ilyushin DB-3 bomber, which was produced in the Factory No. 32.
The normal bomb capacity reached 600 kg on internal supports and up to 1000 kg of bombs (two FAB-500) could be installed outside.
The crew was made up of two people: pilot and gunner. Both crew members were located in a cabin on the wing spars. No shielding was provided.
On October 14, 1937, the assembly of the first flying example of the MPI-1 gunfighter was completed. The prototype was built in the Moscow factory No.84, where Polikarpov had been transferred with his team in the second half of 1936. Some time later this would begin to be called VIT-1 (Vozduzhni Isterbitiel Tankov or Aerial Tank Fighter No.1). This would be the definitive name used from now on to refer to the plane.
The first flight with Valeri Pavlovich Chkalov at the controls took place on October 31. On November 16, during the third test flight, the navigator’s cockpit would be occupied by designer Nikolai Polikarpov.
The VIT managed to reach a fairly high maximum speed for its time, of 494 km/h at 3000 meters altitude. The range recorded at 90% of maximum speed was about 1000 km.
The factory tests, carried out until February 1938, would never be completed due to the impossibility of achieving the specified performance. The plane did not manage to exceed 500 km/h and some problems related to longitudinal and transverse stability were evident.
Despite this, the model proved to have development prospects and only the lack of support from the GUAP prevented its presentation to the state acceptance tests. The VIT-1 incorporated powerful weapons for the time: two 37 mm ShFK-37 (K-37) cannons in the wings, so the VVS decided to receive the model to develop range tests, basically aimed at fine-tuning the cannons.
In these exercises, held at the weapons range near Noginski between July 13, 1938 and July 31, 1939, the guns received an excellent rating and the pilots appreciated the excellent diving qualities of the model. GF Baidukov and MM Gromov participated as pilots for the NII VVS in these tests. Unfortunately, the plane was not yet “polished” and had problems characteristic of any plane under development. On the other hand, firing both cannons in unison practically stopped the plane in flight, while firing just one of them forced the plane to turn to that side, slightly diverting the shot from the desired trajectory.
Testing was stopped after NIP AV VVS test pilot Major Anshitkov refused to continue flying the VIT-1 prototype. This was mainly due to the fact that he was a weapons test pilot and not an airplane test pilot, so flights in an unfinished airplane became especially difficult for him.
In the summer of 1937, in parallel with the military version VIT-1, the project of a civil model was developed, designed to participate in a Paris – New York competition, flying over the Atlantic. This race was scheduled for 1938, but finally it did not take place and the project was abandoned.
A total of five VIT-2 were built.
VIT-1 Powerplant: 2 x 960 hp М-103 Wingspan: 16.50 m Wing area: 40.40 m² Length: 12.70 m Height: 3.40 m Empty weight: 4013 kg Normal takeoff weight: 6453 kg Wing loading: 159 kg/m² Power load: 3.3 kg/hp Maximum speed at sea level: 450 km/h Cruising speed: 417 km/h Practical range: 1000 km Maximum climbing speed: 595 m/min Practical ceiling: 8000 m Time to 5000 m: 8.4 min Takeoff run: 390 m Landing run: 460 m Accommodation: 2 Armament: A ShVAK cannon in nose / two 37 mm cannons in wings / 1 x ShKAS machine gun in turret. Bombload: 600 kg internal / 1000 kg external.
Initial conception of the VIT tank destroyer with M-100 engines
The TsKB-15 single-seat fighter prototype was a diminutive low-wing monoplane of slim configuration, powered by an imported 626kW Hispano-Suiza 12Y inline engine. With an inward-retracting undercarriage, it flew in September 1934 and was followed by the TsKB-19 with the M-100 (Soviet version of the Hispano engine). Armament comprised a 20mm cannon and four 7.62mm machine-guns. Production of a small number as the I-17-2 was reported, but it is not known if the type was used by first-line units. A third prototype (the TsKB-33) had reduced armament in an attempt to cut down weight and increase performance. The projected use of this version as a parasite fighter to be launched from a multiengined ‘mother ship’ was subsequently abandoned.
Engine: 1 x M-100, 550kW Max take-off weight: 1915 kg / 4222 lb Empty weight: 1710 kg / 3770 lb Wingspan: 10.1 m / 33 ft 2 in Length: 7.4 m / 24 ft 3 in Wing area: 17.7 sq.m / 190.52 sq ft Max. speed: 490 km/h / 304 mph Cruise speed: 440 km/h / 273 mph Ceiling: 9700 m / 31800 ft Range w/max.fuel: 800 km / 497 miles Armament: 1 x 20mm machine-guns, 4 x 7.62mm machine-guns Bomb load: 100kg of bombs Crew: 1
The I-16, designed by Nikolai Nikolayevich Polikarpov, externally, differed significantly from other single engined fighters of the period. It had a short fuselage with a large frontal area, wide wing panels with deep wing roots, a massive tail unit and a retractable undercarriage. Its high manoeuvrability, considered to be one of the I-16’s major advantages, primarily resulted from the aft c.g., which made the aircraft extremely unstable. This caused much trouble during flying training, but also had a positive effect.
Nikolai Polikarpov, then head of Design Team No 2 of the Central Design Bureau, developed a draft design for a monoplane fighter, initialiy designated TsKB-12, during 1932-33. Development and construction of two prototypes began in June 1933. The first prototype was powered by a 480 h.p. M-22 air-cooled radial engine, which gave it a speed of 186.5 mph at 16,400 ft. The second prototype, designated TsKB-12bis, had a 600 h.p. Wright Cyclone F-2 driving a Hamilton Standard three-bladed propeller. Both aircraft, fitted with the same NACA engine cowlings and differing only in their powerplants, had been prepared for tests by late 1933. As it was already winter, they were equipped with a fixed ski undercarriage. Although this considerably reduced flying speed, it allowed test flights to start immediately. Valery Chkalov, test pilot of Zavod (Aircraft Factory) 39, took the M-22-engined TsKB-12 for its maiden flight on December 30, 1933, and the second prototype made its maiden flight injanuary 1934. Accordingto Chkalovthe newaircraft proved to be quite difficult and unusual to fly. Both TsKB-12s were refined throughout January, and underwent most of their factory tests at that time. The State tests, aimed at determining basic flight characteristics of the TsKB-12 before a final decision was made on putting the aircraft into series production, started as early as February 1934. On February 16 test pilot Kokkinaki flew the M-22 powered aircraft, and test pilot Stepanchonok tested the machine with the Wright Cyclone.
According to the test pilots both prototypes were very responsive but demanding. They were not forgiving of any sharp control inputs, but progressed easily from one manoeuvre to another. Pilots had to be especially careful during landing, as the aircraft did not tolerate levelling off at height, and stalled immediately. However, pilots noted that the 1-16 was more stable during take-off, landing and banking, than the I-14 fighter prototype designed by the TsentrainiyAero Gidrodinamicheskiy Institut (TsAG I – Central Aero & Hydrodynamic Institute).
The comments on the I-16’s complicated piloting techniques led TsAG 1 experts to doubt whether the aircraft could be spun successfully. Their attitude towards the fighter improved only after Chkalov conducted 75 spins in March 1934, from which the aircraft recovered perfectly.
Another testimony to the I-16’s outstanding characteristics was its use by aerobatic teams, the so-called “Red Five-Aircraft Groups”. In March 1935 the first such group equipped with I-16s comprised pilots Kokkinaki, Shevchenko, Suprun, Evseyev and Preman, who trained extensively to hone their skills. A slow ascending roll of the entire group of five aircraft was their most stunning manoeuvre. Chief of the V-VS Yakov Alksnis suggested that the roll be demonstrated over Moscow’s Red Square during the military parade on May Day.
On April 30, 1935, the pilots arrived at the parade ground, where they were to fly between two buildings spaced some 130 ft apart. At Kokkinaki’s request a widewhite stripe was painted along the centre of the passage between the GUM department store and the Historical Museum for the pilots to use as a reference. This was the passage along which Soviet tank columns drove into Red Square during traditional military parades.
The following day the five bright-red I-16s descended below the rooftops, sped into Red Square in a tight formation with a deafening roar and carried out a steep climb, rolling as one.
The effect was tremendous. Having returned to their airfield the pilots were already leaving for home when Marshal Voroshilov’s aide arrived at the airfield, bringing a considerable cash bonus and promotion for each pilot. Voroshilov telephoned the airfield and told Kokkinaki: “Comrade Stalin highly appreciates the pilots’ skills and is asking them to fly over Moscow once again”.
After that, the five-aircraft group flew above the Moscow streets repeatedly. They were seen over various districts of the city, which resulted in a legend that several “red five-aircraft groups” flew over Moscow on May Day 1935.
To facilitate rapid mastery of the new fighter, pilots from aerobatic teams toured military garrisons throughout 1935. Their demonstration flights were expected to dispel any doubts ordinary pilots might have about the I-16. Later, Polikarpov and all participants in the events were decorated with Orders of Lenin, then the highest state award.
The I-16 entered series production at Zavod 39 in Moscow and Zavod 21 in Nizhny Novgorod in the Volga region. The Moscow factory dealt with every design modification and developed detailed documentation for mass production of the new fighter.
The I-16s produced there were designated in compliance with TsKB serial numbers. In 1934 the factory delivered fifty I-16s with serial numbers 123901-123950 (standing for TsKB-12, produced by Zavod 39, and finally the machine’s individual number). The Moscow factory built eight more aircraft during 1935-36 (four aircraft a year), stopping at aircraft 123958.
Although Zavod 21 started I-16 series production in 1934 it did not get up steam until the following year. The I-16 was the fourth type of aircraft manufactured by Zavod 21 after the I-5, KhAl-1 and I-14. Thus the first I-16s, powered by M-22 c, engines, were designated Type 4. The Nizhny Novgorod factory produced them throughout 1935. The total number of M-22- powered I-16s, including aircraft of the same type built in Moscow, amounted to 400. Type 4 fighters did not take part in combat operations, but they remained in service, primarily with flying schools, until 1941.
I n 1935 I-16s started to be fitted with M-25 engines, which were a Soviet copy of the Wright Cyclone F-3. Engines were produced at the new Zavod 19, built at Perm in the Urals. The factory manufactured a total of 660 M-25s during the first year of its operation. Some of the engines were expected to be mounted on I-16s. Zavod 21 designated the new M-25 powered variant the Type 5.
The 1-16 was armed with the state-of-the-art 7.62mm ShKAS machine-gun from the outset. This weapon, developed by armourers Shpitalny and Kornaritsky in 1932, had the world’s highest rate of fire, at 1,800 rounds per minute. At first the ShKAS machine-gun, launched into mass production in 1934 just like the 1-16, had a number of snags which had to be rectified in the course of operation. Although the new gun cost five times more than the mass-produced PV-1 machine gun (5,000 Roubles in 1934), it was one-and-a-half times lighter and had twice the rate of fire.
Ten I-16s manufactured by Zavod 39 in Moscow underwent service tests at the 107th Air Squadron, the Bryansk Air Brigade, from August 28 until November 3, 1935. Military pilots assessed the aircraft’s advantages and disadvantages, and every possible combat usage. They found that lowering the ailerons during take-off and landing (the ailerons of the I-16 Types 4 and 5 also acted as flaps) reduced the take-off run and landing roll considerably. This became quite a strong argument for I-16 proponents, since the work of enlarging existing airfields to accommodate new fighters had just started.
As far as piloting techniques were concerned, it was stated: “The aircraft was easy to control and very responsive to the control stick … it did not allow any mistakes … too strong a pull on the control stick during banking and landing may result in a spin stall.” Soviet feature films of the 1930s featuring the 1-16, such as Istrebiteli (Fighters) and Valery Chkalov, prove that the fighter indeed performed this aerobatic manoeuvre perfectly.
The I-16 was initially refined and improved by a team of designers in Moscow, headed by Polikarpov, in April 1936 this team developed the TsKB-12P (1-I6P), with two wing-mounted 20mm SWAK cannon and two ShKAS machine-guns.
The I-16P underwent tests frorn July to September 1936. As early as 1937 this variant, designated Type 12, was launched into series production at Nizinny Novgorod. The armament layout was modified in 1938; the cannon remained in the wing centre section, but the machine-guns were now housed in the fuselage. This I-16, powered by the supercharged M-25V engine, was designated Type 17 and put into mass production.
Another TsKB project entailed fitting the fighter with a retractable ski undercarriage. Zavod 39 in Moscow fitted an M-22-powered I-16 with such an undercarriage on February 2, 1936. Tests using aircraft Nos 123904 and 123906 proved the system satisfactory, but the matter of mass-producing such an undercarriage had never been raised, and for the following two winters military units operated I-16s with fixed ski undercarriages. The ski retraction system was improved in 1938, and from then on all seriesproduction aircraft (save for Type 29 fighters) could be fitted with skis in winter without any detriment to their flying characteristics.
After the I-16 was put into mass production at Nizhny Novgorod, all major I-16 refinements and modifications were developed there. In 1937 the factory worked on reducing the weight of certain I-16s. These aircraft, the weight of which did not usually exceed 3,2851b, were registered as “red aircraft” ‘ They were special I-16s for the “Red Five-Aircraft Groups” and were sometimes stripped of armament and even some of their equipment and instruments. It took these lightweight versions 12sec to complete a turn, compared with the usual 15-16sec. The exact number of such I-16s built is unknown, but in 1938-39 every military district had an aerobatic team equipped with them. Separate I-16s of this type took part in hostilities in 1941-42.
Zavod 21 at Nizhny Novgorod manufactured 1,881 I-16 Type 5s, Type 12s and Type 15s (UTI-4 two-seat trainers) in 1937. However, considerably improved versions, the Types 10 and 17, with M-25V engines, were put into mass production in 1938. At the same time much effort went into reinforcing the structure of earlier models. These constraints resulted in a significant drop in output, only 1,068 I-16s of all types being produced in 1938.
In early 1939 the M-25 engine was replaced by the 830 h.p. M-62, aircraft thus modified being designated I-16 Type 18.
In late 1939 Zavod 21 built aircraft powered by M-62 and M-63 engines, thus replacing machine-gun-armed Type 10 fighters with Types 18 and 24 fighters, and cannon-armed I-16s Type 17 with Type 27 and 28 respectively.
As it was the most numerous Soviet fighter, the I-16 was frequently used for testing new armament. It was fitted with bomb racks for the first time in early 1937. A fighter equipped with underwing racks designed to carry 280kg (6201b) of bombs was tested at the Nauchnolspitatelniy Institut VoyennoVozdushnykh Sil (NII V-VS Scientific Testing Institute of the Air Force) f rom February 10 to March 3,1937. It had four DER-32 racks for AO-10 bombs and a DER-3 rack for FAB-100 bombs under each wing. This modification never entered production. Later, series-production I-16s were equipped with standard bomb racks similar to those of the I-153, capable of carrying tear-shaped PSB-21 external fuel tanks or two 100kg bombs.
In 1939 I-16s were fitted with RS-82 rocket projectiles (RPs) mounted underwing, and were combattested duringthe RussoJapanese conflict in Mongolia. This version entered series production in 1940 and was later widely employed in combat.
In the summer of 1941 I-16s were equipped with two RS-132 RPs under each wing, although there is little information on the use of this weaponry.
The I-16’s operating altitude was increased by using TK-1 turbosuperchargers powered by engine exhaust gases. Experts believed that such turbosuperchargers would considerably boost the aircraft’s combat capabilities at altitudes up to 10,000m (32,800ft).
The first I-16V (Vysotniy, or high-altitude), powered by the M-25A and fitted with two TK-1 turbosuperchargers, was operational by late 1938. The Soviet Union’s first high-altitude fighter, itwas followed by several others, powered by M-25V and M-62 engines. Turbosuperchargers posed a fire risk where their exhaust plumes hit the fuselage, so the sides and the wing centre sections of such aircraft had special metal plating.
A number of successful flights were conducted in 1939. Powered by an M-25V and fitted with two TK-1s, I-16 No 1021582 reached a maximum speed of 307 m.p.h. at 28,200ft, and a maximum speed of more than 310 m.p.h. when powered by an M-62. Such aircraft did not see series production.
In the second half of the year Zavod 21 started manufacturing the latest I-16 variant, the Type 29, which incorporated work on gun armament undertaken in 1939. In addition to two synchronised ShKAS machine guns it was armed with the B1 heavy machine-gun, accornmodated between the wheel wells. The Type 29’s wings had standard mounts for six RS-82 RPs and attachment points for external fuel tanks. In total, 2,207 I-16s of the following types were produced in 1940: Type 18 and Type 24 – 760 Type 28 – 277 Type 29 – 570 Type 15(UTI-4) – 600
The last year of I-16 series production was 1940. The final variant, the Type 29, was removed from the production plan in the last quarter of the year, and in December Zavod 21 began building the Lavochkin LaGG-3 fighter under the factory designation Type 31. The last 80 Type 29 fighters and 256 UTI-4s from previous backlogs were delivered in 1941.
Zavod 153 in Novosibirsk also started building I-16s in 1937. It manufactured 27 Type 5s in 1937, 105 of the same type in 1938, and 254 (including some Type 24s) in 1939. It was decided against producing 500 I-16 Type 24s planned for 1940; the Novosibirsk factory delivered 503 UTI-4 trainers. In 1941 this plant produced 404 UTI-4s and 19 Type 24s, but late in the year it started building LaGG-3 and Yakoviev Yak-7 fighters. The last series- production I-16s – two-seat UTI-4s – were built at Zavod 458 in Rostov-on-Don from March 1941. This factory had produced 310 UTI-4s and overhauled another 146 by the outbreak of war. After evacuation to Baku in Azerbaijan it continued building them.
I-16B
At Baku the trainer was converted into a combat aircraft, designated UTI-413 (Type 15B). The wing centre section housed two non-synchronised Berezin 12.7mm heavy machine-guns, and the wings carried three RS-82 RPs per side and racks for 110 lb of bombs. The rear cockpit was covered by a duralum in fairing. This version was tested by the 480th Istrebiteiniy Aviatsionny Polk (IAP – Fighter Air Regiment) at its airfield near Kishly, and by the 266th IAP at Shekhikay, near Baku. In early 1942 it was admitted that the Type 15B was superior to other I-16 variants as far as firepower and adaptability were concerned. Moreover, standard UTI-4s could be converted into Type 15Bs. The last 83 UTI-4s were built in Baku in 1942, but it is not known whether these aircraft were armed.
Three variants used by the Republicans were the I-16 Tip 5 with the 541-kW (725-hp) M-25, an enclosed cockpit and two machine-guns; the Tip 6 with the 544-kW (730-hp) M-25A and a strengthened airframe; and the Tip 10 with the 559-kW (750-hp) M-25V, an open cockpit and four machine-guns. Deliveries began late in 1936, and estimates for strengths (delivered and locally built) vary from 280+ to 475, while claims against it included 94 by the Nationalists, a similar number by the Germans and 242 by the Italians. The I-16 proved a good fighter in terms of performance, but was too lightly armed with just rifle-calibre guns, was an indifferent gun platform, and lacked the structural strength to deal with multiple hits from heavier guns. Some 22 aircraft fell into Nationalist hands at the end of the war, together with 90 aircraft under construction.
The I-16 was classic wood and metal design, based on the resources and capabilities of Soviet Russia’s aviation industry in the early 1930s. Its fuselage was built by covering the frame, of 11 frames, four longerons and eight stringers, with a plywood skin. The frame was of pine, ash and prima birch plywood. Areas needing reinforcement were fitted with steel struts. The skin was made by gluing together birch veneer sheets with casein glue on a special breadboard construction. Layers of veneer sheets were placed perpendicular to each other, and at an angle of 45 degrees to the aircraft’s roll axis.
The skin consisted of port and starboard halves, its maximum thickness being 5.5mm (0.2in) and its minimum thickness, in the tail, 2mrn (0.08in). Following assembly the entire wooden fuselage surface was covered with calico, puttied, and painted.
The internal fuselage surface was painted with grey oil paint during the first few years of series production, but from February 1939 it was first coated with ALG-2 primer to increase moisture resistance, and then with AE-9 grey enamel.
The wing centre section, which united the wing panels, fuselage, undercarriage and engine, was the main load-bearing unit. It comprised two trussed spars, linked and strengthened by ribs and tubular bracing struts. Its upper skin was wooden where it connected with the fuselage, and duralumin from the second rib. The upper part of the centre section had a hatch at the junction with the wing panels for access to the machine-guns or cannon. The UTI trainers and I-16 Type 29 lacked these hatches.
The lower part of the centre section had undercarriage fairings with glazed windows to enable the pilot to see whether the undercarriage was retracted.
The entire centre-section trailing edge on later I-16s was fitted with landing flaps, deflecting to a maximum angle of 60 degrees. The wing panels were similar to the centre section in design, and were connected to it by steel liners with rifled heads on the butts of tubular spars. The junction was covered by a 100mm (3.9in)-wide duralumin band. The front part of the wing was covered by a 0.6mm-thick (0.02in) duralumin skin, extending back 44.5 per cent from the leading edge on top an 14.5 percent below, and the entire wing was then covered with fabric.
At first the ailerons were fitted with a droop mechanism enabling them to act as flaps during landing, but from the Type 10 landing flaps were fitted The first series had a pneumatic flap extension, later replaced by a mechanical system.
The ailerons and tail unitwere made of duralumin and fabric covered. The fin was offset to eliminate torque. As the M-22 and M-25 (and M-62) rotated th propeller in opposite directions, the Type 4’s fin was offset 2′ to starboard, while that of followup types was offset 2′ to port.
The tailplane could be adjusted on the ground within 3′, allowin ground crew to achieve the most acceptable control column load for various c.g. positions. A removable duralumin fairing permitted easy fin adjustment. The retractable undercarriage consisted of two three-arm struts. A mechanicaljack on the starboard side of the cockpit required 44 turns to effect retraction. On aircraft of the last series the tailskid had a small 150mm (6in) tailwheel. In rainy weather pilots often fitted a tail ski, as it prevented the skid from burying itself in soft ground. Early-series I-16s had 700mm x 100mm wheels with mechanical brakes, while subsequent models had 700mm x 150mm wheels, with brake pedals mounted on the rudder bar.
The Type 10 and all subsequent variants had cotter-pins in side covers, running into the wing centre section, designed to hold the ski undercarriage retracted. These were covered with special plates in summer.
The pilot’s seat, with a pan for a parachute, initially had a light removable seat back with a soft leatherette cushion. Later it was replaced by an 8mm-thick (0.3in) 30kg (66 lb) armoured seat back. A vertical-adjustment lever on the right side of the seat provided a travel of 110mm (4.5in).
The forward -sliding windscreen had an aperture for the OP-1 gunsight, covered by a sliding panel protecting it against oil and mud and opened by the pilot immediately before openingfire.
From the Type 10, fighters were fitted with fixed Plexiglas windscreens with a stainless steel framework. The OP-1 gunsight was replaced by the PAK-1 collimator sight.
The upper part of the instrument panel, mounted on the third fuselage frame, had two round recesses for the reloading handles of the dorsal machineguns. The instrument panel stayed almost unchanged on all versions of the M 6 and was painted black. It was illuminated by two round windows inside the pilot’s windscreen in daytime, and by two cockpit hinged lamps, accommodated under the sight, at night.
The engine cowlings of I-16s powered by M-25, M-62 and M-63 engines comprised a 1,388mm (54.5in) front ring and six removable covers. The cowling was held together by hinge-rods and locks. The junction of the covers’ leading edges and the front ring was tightened by a 0.5mm-wide (0.02in) stainless-steel band.
The front part of the cowling had nine air intakes for cooling the engine. The side covers of the cowlingwere fitted with eight air outlets with ducts riveted from the inside. The exhaust pipes were connected to the same air outlets (the upper port outlet had two exhaust pipes linked to it, and the lower exhaust pipes were also coupled on aircraft fitted with retractable ski undercarriage. One of the main requirements consisted of positioning exhaust pipes flush with the cowling to reduce its sooting-up.
The propeller spinner had a diameter of 530mm (20.9in) and was fitted with a special ratchet gear for starting the engine with the help of an automobile ground-starter.
Tupolev TB-3 experiments started with two I 16 fighters, and slowly worked up to five, four of which were rolled up ramps on to cradles fixed to the bomber’s wings, while a fifth joined up in flight, hooking on to yet another version of the trapeze gear used in British and American experiments. To help get this heavy formation airborne the engines of the wing mounted fighters were run up at take off, and once up, the TB 3 could just maintain altitude under its own power.
A total of 7,005 single-seat and 1,639 two-seaters were produced. Six wrecks were restored in Russia for Sir Tim Wallis and were the only flying examples in the world.
Type 4 M-22-powered first series-production I-16, with cylindrical NACA cowling. The rear edge of the cowling skirted the fuselage with a steady exit slit of about 2in, and the cowling was therefore slightly tapered
Type 5 M-25A-powered and mass-produced from mid-1935 until February 1938. Aircraft of the first series had a different engine cowling from the Type 4 and a propeller spinner. In the course of production Type 5 was gradually fitted with 700mm x 150mm wheels, a fixed windshield, and wing panels with closer rib spacing and smaller ailerons
Type 10 M-25V-powered modification of the I-16 following three years of series production. Changes included:
Two dorsal synchronised ShKAS machine-guns, mounted inside protruding fairings
Sliding canopy replaced by fixed windshield with stainlesssteel frame
OP-1 Aldis optical gunsight replaced by PAK-1 collimator gunsight
Airframe reinforced, and number of ribs on upper surface of wing increased
Ailerons reduced and aileron droop mechanism not used. Landing speed decreased with help of landing flaps. Most Type 10s fitted with pneumatic flaps. Aircraft from No 102175, produced in the spring of 1939, equipped with mechanicallyoperated landing flaps 19 Fitted with 6in oil radiator; oil cooler air intake accommodated in lower part of engine cowling
Type 12 M-25A-powered, based on Type 5, not produced in large numbers. Two wing-mounted ShKAS machine-guns augmented by two 20mm SWAK cannon
Type 14 (UTI-2) M-22-powered two-seat trainer stripped of armament
Type 15 (UTI-4) M-25A or M-25V-powered two-seat trainer stripped of armament and fitted with manual controls and extra engine controls. Undercarriage retraction jack and indicator housed in rear cockpit. M-25V-powered variants with air intakes in lower part of cowling. Undercarriage shock-absorber struts fitted with torque links. Most UTI-4s fitted with AVA propeller with locked pitch-control mechanism. From aircraft 1521109 all subsequent fighters given 35-litre wing centre-section fuel tanks. From January 1939, some UTI-4s fitted with night-flying equipment and non-retracting undercarriage
Type 17 M-25W powered modification of Type 10, armed with SWAK cannon instead of wing-mounted ShKAS machine-guns. Rounds fed from ammunition boxes inside fuselage. Hatch cut in upper fuselage for stowing ammunition belts. Upper part of engine cowling with rectangular cut-out for same purpose
Type 18 M-62-powered modification of Type 10, with more powerful engine, self-sealing fuel tank and additional 12-litre oil tank. Oil radiator mounted slightly lower, so lower part of engine cowling “sagged” slightly. Lower air intake of oil radiator enlarged. Carburettor ram-air pipe mounted on top
Type 27 M-62-powered modified Type 17; powerplant modified in similar way to Type 18 Type 24 – M-63-powered follow-on of Type 18 to comply with strength standards of 1937. It incorporated:
AVA variable-pitch propeller and new propeller spinner
Engine fitted with R-2 constant-speed unit Undercarriage shock-absorber struts with torque links. Shockabsorber travel increased to 3.8in, compared with 1.2-1.4in of previous version
Tailskid fitted with small wheel and oleo-pneumatic shock absorber
Mechanically controlled landing flaps operated by lever on port side behind pilot’s seat
Cockpit fitted with a second drop side to starboard
A manual starting system, and hatch for radio cut out of fuselage on starboard side between Frames 7 and 8.
Type 28 M-63-powered follow-on of Type 27, with same modifications as Type 24 Type 29 – Powered by M-63. 0.5in Berezin BS synchronised heavy machine-gun mounted in lower fuselage between wheel wells; no wing-mounted guns. Oil radiator moved to space between fourth and fifth engine cylinders. Undercarriage height reduced by 1.25in; wheel wells spaced further apart. Space between wheel wells covered by removable fairing. Radioequipped aircraft fitted with mast aerials mounted to starboard on engine cowling. Propeller diameter reduced to 8.85ft
1939 Production Type 10, M-25V engine – 426 Type 18, M-62 engine – 177 Type 24, M-63 engine – 155 Type 17, M-25V engine – 314 Type 27, M-62 engine – 59 Type 28, M-63 engine – 16 Type 15 (UTI-4), M-25 engine – 424 Total – 1571
Specifications
Prototype Engine: M-22 Max speed: 188 mph at 3280 ft Max speed: 175 mph at 16,400 ft Time to 16,400 ft: 10.9 min 360 deg turn: 16.5 sec
Prototype Engine: Wright Cyclone Max speed: 224 mph at 3280 ft Max speed: 195 mph at 16,400 ft Time to 16,400 ft: 7.9 min 360 deg turn: 16.5 sec
Type 4 Year: 1935 Span: 29 ft 6 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 3 in Loaded weight: 2985 lb Max speed SL: 225 mph Max speed at 9840 ft: 215 mph Landing speed: 66 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 4.4 min Service ceiling: 24,400 ft
Type 5 Year: 1936 Span: 29 ft 6 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 8 in / 5.98m Empty weight: 2466 lb Loaded weight: 3325 lb Max speed SL: 242 mph Max speed at 8860 ft: 277 mph Landing speed: 73 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 4 min Service ceiling: 29,855 ft Takeoff run: 720 ft
Type 10 Year: 1938 Engine: M-25V Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 11 in Empty weight: 2925 lb Loaded weight: 3783 lb / 1716 kg Max speed SL: 247 mph Max speed at 10,370 ft: 278 mph Landing speed: 78 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 3.4 min Service ceiling: 27,780 ft Takeoff run: 850 ft
Type 12 Year: 1937 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 8 in Empty weight: 2557 lb Loaded weight: 3788 lb Max speed SL: 244 mph Max speed at 7870 ft: 268 mph Landing speed: 80 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 4.4 min Service ceiling: 27,000 ft Takeoff run: 900 ft
Type 15 / UTI-4 Year: 1937 Engine: M-25 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 8 in Empty weight: 2549 lb Loaded weight: 3215 lb Max speed SL: 247 mph Max speed at 9185 ft: 280 mph Landing speed: 73 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 3.4 min Service ceiling: 29,400 ft Takeoff run: 810 ft
Type 17 Year: 1938 Engine: M-25V Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 11 in Empty weight: 3140 lb Loaded weight: 3990 lb Max speed SL: 239 mph Max speed at 8855 ft: 264 mph Landing speed: 81 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 4.4 min Service ceiling: 27,000 ft Takeoff run: 920 ft
Type 18 Year: 1939 Engine: M-62 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 11 in Empty weight: 3160 lb Loaded weight: 4149 lb Max speed SL: 257 mph Max speed at 14,435 ft: 286 mph Landing speed: 82 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 3 min Service ceiling: 30,500 ft Takeoff run: 670 ft
Type 24 Year: 1939 Engine: M-63 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 20 ft 1 in Empty weight: 3048 lb Loaded weight: 4149 lb Max speed SL: 255 mph Max speed at 15,420 ft: 287 mph Landing speed: 81 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 3.4 min Service ceiling: 31,825 ft Takeoff run: 850 ft
Type 27 Year: 1939 Engine: M-62 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 19 ft 11 in Empty weight: 2944 lb Loaded weight: 3986 lb Landing speed: 81 mph Takeoff run: 755 ft
Type 28 Year: 1939 Engine: M-63 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 8 in Length: 20 ft 1 in Empty weight: 3093 lb Loaded weight: 4383 lb Max speed SL: 265 mph Max speed at 6560 ft: 288 mph Landing speed: 93 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 3.2 min Service ceiling: 32,645 ft Takeoff run: 670 ft
Type 29 Year: 1940 Span: 29 ft 6.5 in Height: 10 ft 6.5 in Length: 20 ft 1 in Empty weight: 4332 lb Loaded weight: 4227 lb Max speed SL: 260 mph Max speed at 14,700 ft: 292 mph Landing speed: 81 mph Climb to 10,000 ft: 3.3 min Service ceiling: 32,150 ft
Working at the former Duks factory (GAZ 1) at Khodinka, Moscow, Nikolai N Polikarpov, assisted by I M Kostkin, designed a conceptually advanced single-seat fighter, the IL-400, which flew on 15 August i923. A cantilever low-wing monoplane of wooden construction powered by a 400hp Liberty water-cooled engine, the IL-400 proved longitudinally unstable and crashed shortly after becoming airborne on its first flight. Extensive redesign, both aerodynamic and structural, resulted in the IL-400b (also to be known as the IL-2), which, flown on 18 July 1924, retained a plywood-covered wooden fuselage mated with an entirely new, shorter span, thinner-section wing with dural ribs and corrugated dural skinning. Armament comprised two 7.62mm machine guns. Following State trials, contracts were placed for eight and then a further 25 of a modified version of the fighter which reverted to all-wood construction. Designated I-1M-5 (and also referred to as the IL-3) and powered by an M-5 engine – the licence-built version of the 400hp Liberty – this completed State tests on 16 March 1926. The series I-1M-5 suffered from low manufacturing standards, however, was seriously overweight and dangerously unstable. It was not delivered to service units.
Max take-off weight: 1530 kg / 3373 lb Empty weight: 1112 kg / 2452 lb Wingspan: 10.8 m / 35 ft 5 in Length: 7.75 m / 25 ft 5 in Wing area: 20.00 sq.m / 215.28 sq ft Max. speed: 263 km/h / 163 mph
All Aero 