Oelimichen No.2

In 1922 Oemichen was able to dispense with the gasbag of the first machine and fly free. Etienne Oelimichen’s No. 2 machine was powered by a 120 hp Gnome rotary engine. It had four large rotors and eight stabilizing and steering propellers about an open lattice work frame and it flew for the first time on 11 November 1922.

Etienne Oelimichen’s first helicopter flew in 1922 for a distance of 60 m (197 ft). In 1923 he made the first hovering flight of more than five minutes.

The Oemichen No.2 was basically a steel-tube framework of cruciform layout, with 2-blade paddle-shaped rotors at the extremities of the four arms. The angle of these blades could be varied by warping. Five of the propellers, turning in a horizontal plane, served to stabilise the machine laterally; another propeller mounted at the nose was for steering the helicopter; and the remaining pair acted as pusher propellers for forward propulsion. The opposing pairs of rotors were of slightly different diameters. The Oemichen No.2 exhibited, for its time, a considerable degree of stability and controllability, and in all made more than a thousand test flights during the middle 1920s. By 1923 it was able to remain airborne for several minutes at a time, and on 14 April 1924 it established the first-ever FAI distance record for helicopters of 360m. Three days later it increased this to 525m. On 4 May 1924 this contraption made a closed¬ circuit flight of 1 km (0.62 mile) at Arlonans to set a distance record for helicopters, It was airborne for 14 min with the kilometer taking 7 minutes and 40 seconds, to win a 90,000 franc prize.

A 180hp Gnome engine was substituted later.

Despite the fact that it was able to demonstrate sufficient controllability and power in ground effect for this historic flight, it was not a practical flying machine. In recognition of the impracticality of the machine, Oemichen began pursuing a series of aircraft with a single-main rotor and two anti-torque rotors, but had little success.

Oemichen No.2
Engine: 1 x Gnome Rhone, 135kW
Rotor diameter: 2 x 7.60m + 2 x 6.40m
Empty weight: 800kg

Oelimichen No.1

Etienne Oemichen, a young engineer with the Peugeot motor car company, began to experiment with rotating-wing designs in 1920, and in all designed and built six different vertical take-off machines. When the first of these failed to develop enough lift from its twin rotors and 25hp engine to rise off the ground, he added a hydrogen-filled balloon on top of it to give it added stability and lift.

With two rotors of 20.99 ft and weighing 814 lb, it flew for 1 min 40 seconds, and later 5 minutes.

Odier-Vendome Biplane 1910

Pilot – Antoine Odier

Carrying the names of its designer (Antoine Odier) and ordered by Turcat-Méry race car driver Henri Rougier, this pusher biplane was built by the Vendôme company. It appeared in 1909 and was (under)powered by one of Rougier’s employers 18hp Turcat-Méry engines.

The designer also made the first flight of this, his first aircraft in May 27, 1909, which was also Odier’s first flight, ever.

A later improved tractor biplane followed in 1910, with less arched wings.

Second version

Odier & Bessiere Clino-giro

French engineers Odier and Bessiere flew their combination airplane and autogyro, dubbed the “Clino-giro”, in 1931, at Guyancourt. The foundation of the craft is a revamped Caudron C-193 with a rotor smaller and stiffer than normal for an autogyro attached. Th engineers claimed that the craft had a climb angle three times that of an ordinary airplane and a radius of action much better than that of a conventional autogyro.

Ochoa Jersey Devil

The “Jersey Devil”, also known as the “Jersey Mosquito” or “Ochoaplane” built by Victor Leaton Ochoa, and datable to 1908-09 in the USA. Based on two bicycle frames between which was mounted a six-horse power motor and below that a seat for the operator. The whole machine weighs about 250 pounds. The craft is notable for having several ‘interesting’ design features, such as the retractable truss-work wing structure, and the wing surface being concave, not convex.