Domenjoz Glider

The Swiss (then) John Domenjoz was with Pegoud, the inventors of stunt flying; both were the first to complete a looping in 1913 while they worked at the Blériot School. By the late 20’s Domenjoz had got the idea to propel a glider by sail like the ancient ships. In 1930 he built at Pine Point, Maine, this glider; towed by a car at 50 mph it did reach an altitude of 200 feet above to sands at Old Orchard, but the sails proved to be utterly useless. The Domenjoz glider had an evident “Blériot connection” ….the Blériot XI type’s lattice fuselage and tail shape are all too obvious.

Dokuchayev No.3

One of the designs of the Russian flying instructor A. Ya. Dokuchayev [А. Я. Докучаев]. The 1913-1914 number 3 machine – the Докучаев-3 – was based on two Henry Farman design which gives this mix. The front part is based on the Farman-VII and the tail side is based on the Farman-XVI (about equal with the French HF.20). This resulted in this one-off pusher trainer, fitted with a 80 hp Gnôme rotary engine. The instructor seat is right behind the seat of the pupil, somewhat higher placed so that he can see easily to the front. He could also guide the steering done by the pupil (or take it over).

Doak 16 / VZ-4

Company president, Edmond R. Doak, had experimented with ducted fan and various other air moving principles since 1935. He first proposed a VTOL aircraft using the tilt duct principle to the military as early as 1950. The Army issued the contract to Doak on April 10, 1956. The U.S. Army Transportation Research and Engineering Command purchased a single Doak 16. The Model 16 made its first flight in February 1958 and the single prototype was put through extensive pre-delivery flight testing and was not officially accepted by the Army until September 1959. Upon acceptance the craft, which had already been allocated the serial number 56-9642, was given the designation VZ-4.

Early 1958

Doak Model 16 was the first VTOL aircraft to demonstrate the tilt duct concept. It was built by the Doak Aircraft Company of Torrance, CA.
The fuselage was constructed of welded steel tubing covered by moulded fiberglass skin from the cockpit forward, while the wings and tail were metal-skinned. The aircraft was designed to accommodate a pilot and observer sitting in tandem, though as far as can be determined the observer’s seat was never actually installed in the prototype.
With a mid-wing, conventional tail, and fixed tricycle landing gear, a single 1000shp Lycoming YT53-L-1 turbine mounted in the fuselage just aft of the cockpit drove two ducted-fan airscrews, one fixed within each rotating wingtip fan assembly. The fans were set in the vertical position for takeoff and landing, and were rotated into the horizontal plane for normal forward flight. Some additional directional stability was provided by routing the turbine exhaust through a set of hinged louvers mounted in the aircraft’s tail.
The cantilever wing and tail unit were of all metal construction. To save development costs, Doak incorporated numerous off the shelf items in the design, such as the landing gear from a Cessna 182, seats from a F-51, duct actuators from T-33 electric flap motors, and the rudder mechanism from an earlier Doak aircraft.

The design empty weight was 900kg with a design gross vertical take-off weight of 1170kg. These grew to 1037kg and 1443kg during the life of the program. To keep weight down, the original specification called for the aircraft fuselage to remain uncovered. However, it subsequently was felt that this would severely limit being able to obtain any meaningful forward speed data, and that the added weight would allow for much more valuable data to be collected.

The wingtip-mounted ducts were five feet in diameter with a four foot inside diameter. Their construction was of aluminum alloy with a fiberglass leading edge section. Eight fixed pitch fiberglass fan blades turned at a maximum fan speed of 4800 rpm. Ahead of the fan in the forward part of the duct were fourteen fiberglass variable inlet guide vanes. The vane angle varied during hover to modulate the thrust produced by the duct, and thus to obtain roll control. The prop was set back two feet from the front of the duct to prevent airflow separation. Nine stainless steel stator blades located aft of the fan straightened the air flow as it exited the duct.
The ducts rotated through 92 degrees, pointing horizontal for forward flight, and pivoting to 2 degrees aft of vertical during hover. The ducts rotated past vertical to compensate for the thrust from the jet exhaust. A switch on the control column initiated the duct rotation. To power the fans, drive shafts traveled through the wing quarter chord. Doak-designed flexible couplings compensated for misalignment and wing flexing.

A Lycoming T-53-L-1 turboshaft engine located in the fuselage just below the wing root provided power. It produced 825hp (some sources stated 840hp). A “T” box on the engine transmitted power to the ducts using a four-inch tubular aluminum shaft and two smaller steel shafts of 3.8cm each.
Flight controls consisted of standard stick and rudder. An electrical and mechanical interlock system controlled all functions for both hovering and forward flight. There were no other cockpit controls. In hover, a cruciform shaped vane in the tail pipe at the rear of the fuselage controlled pitch and yaw by deflecting the engine exhaust. Rotating the inlet guide vanes in the ducts provided roll control by restricting airflow. As the ducts rotated from vertical to horizontal, a mechanical control system gradually phased out control of the inlet guide vanes and left them aligned with the duct airflow. There was no artificial damping or power boost. Doak looked down on any type of automatic stabilization system, feeling that the aircraft should be a satisfactory flying machine without any such equipment. Careful selection of the duct location allowed the fuselage to remain level throughout the transition.
Ground testing began at Torrance Municipal Airport during February 1958. Tests consisted of 32 hours in a test stand, and 18 hours of tethered hovering and taxi tests. The first free hovering flight was performed on February 25 1958. Initial Doak testing at Torrance was completed in June 1958 and was followed by a complete tear down inspection. The aircraft then was transferred to Edwards AFB in October 1958. At Edwards, it performed 50 hours of tests, including transitions at altitudes as great as 1830m. James B. Reichert completed the first conversions in 1959. Following these tests, the Army accepted the Doak 16 in September 1959 and transferred it to NASA Langley for further tests.
In 1961 Douglas Aircraft Co. purchased the design rights and test data on the VZ 4. Douglas liked the aircraft and had some ideas for improving it, primarily by installing a larger engine and making numerous structural improvements. They made an unsolicited proposal to the Army in 1961, but could not sell their ideas. The Doak 16 remained at NASA Langley until August of 1972. Eventually it was transferred to the U.S. Army Transportation Command Museum at Fort Eustis, VA, near Newport News, where it is on display.

VZ-4
Engine: 1 x Lycoming YT53, 625kW / 800 hp
Wingspan: 7.77m
Length: 9.75m
Height: 3m
Wing area: 8.73sq.m
Empty weight: 900-1037 kg
Max take-off weight: 1170-1443kg
Max speed: 370km/h est.
Rate of climb SL: 30m/s
Hover ceiling: 1830m
Endurance: 1 hr
Range: 370km
Crew: 2

Doak Aircraft Co Inc

Incorporated in 1940 in Los Angeles, California, developing the Model 16 VZ-4Da, with ducted propellers rotating at wingtips, under contract to the U.S. Army Transportation Research and Engineering Command, 1958. This was transferred to NASA for further evaluation. Doak sold out to Douglas Aircraft Company in early 1960s. Doak finally closed its doors early in 1961.

Dmitriev X-14d

Dmitriev’s airplane is neither an outgrowth of a hang glider nor an enclosed cockpit design. First, it’s in-credibly tiny only 10.9 feet long, 16.4 feet in wingspan, and four feet high at the tail. Its wing area is only 18.9 square feet. It’s light, even by ultra¬light standards 110 pounds, as Dmitriev had it outfitted in July 1992.
But Dmitrievs diminutive craft is most striking in its use of big airplane features to get maximum performance from its flying surfaces. Its wing has airliner style flaps and leading edge slats, giving it more lift and thereby reducing takeoff and landing speeds. A slight but noticeable forward sweep to the wing makes it more controllable at low speeds. And extra joints in the elevators and rudder increase the effectiveness of their small surfaces.
It all comes apart and folds up for storage. Each wing section detaches and then folds in half, the tail group comes off and folds, and even the aluminum tubes connecting the tail section are designed to telescope. The result is a package you can store in a closet, rightfully earning it the nickname of “suitcase ultralight.”
The X 14d’s leading edge slat and triple slotted flaps are controlled by a single mechanical lever on the pilot’s left side, the flaps and slats extend and retract in unison. Fully extended, they greatly magnify the lift of the X 14d’s tiny wings and reduce the speed needed to get airborne. They also allow a slower landing. On the down side, flaps also increase drag, so they’re retracted into the wing structure for cruising.
Similar slotted surfaces are evident at the tail, but their functions are different. Horizontal elevators at the rear deflect the air passing over them, controlling the air¬plane’s pitch axis; Dmitriev added joints in the elevators to increase their effectiveness without increasing their size. The upright rudder, which controls yaw axis gets a similar segmented treatment.
Aiding the X 14d’s ailerons are spoilers, or short slats, that rise from the upper surface of the wing just forward of the ailerons. In Dmitriev’s design, each spoiler ex¬tends automatically when the aileron behind it is fully deflected, enhancing roll control.at low speed.
Primary flight functions, including throttle setting, elevator position, and aileron position, are con¬trolled from a hand hewn control yoke. Seated forward of the wing, With legs nearly straight ahead the pilot hss an unimpeded view, though his ears are just inches from the engine din.
Dmitriev is hardly a test pilot, and he said his longest flight in Kirghizia lasted just 8.5 minutes, when his engine quit. He says the highest he has flown it is 350 feet much too close to the cold, hard ground for testing a plane’s behavior in steep turns or stalls.

Engine: 24 hp.
Length: 10.9 ft.
Wingspan: 16.4 ft.
Height: 4 ft.
Wing area: 18.9 sq.ft.
Empty wt: 110 lbs.