Bell X-14

The Bell X-14 was produced as a vertical take-off prototype and achieved its first hovering flight on 17 February l957. The X-14 was originally created to explore the feasibility of operating a VTOL aircraft from a normal pilot station using standard flight instruments and references. Of equal importance, the X-14 was to demonstrate various VTOL systems and engine technologies—the aircraft was the first to demonstrate the concept of using vectored jet thrust as the only power system.
The airframe was as simple and light as possible, and was characterized by an open cockpit and fixed tailwheel landing gear. In its original form the aeroplane was powered by a pair of Bristol Siddeley Viper turbojets located side-by-side in the extreme nose of the aeroplane exhausting via nozzles on the sides of the aeroplane on the centre of gravity. For vertical take-off the nozzles were vectored directly downward, and for transition into forward flight were vectored gradually aft. The first successful transition was accomplished in May 1958, and the aeroplane was later re-engined with General Electric J85 turbojets. The X-14 made its last flight on 29 May 1981.
The X-14 successfully demonstrated that the concept of vectored jet thrust was viable, as subsequently used on the BAe/McDonnell Douglas Harrier. Flight tests using the X-14’s variable stability control system resulted in major contributions to the understanding of V/STOL handling characteristics. The X-14 also proved useful as a testbed for various unique V/STOL concepts, such as NASA’s direct side-force maneuvering system.
Over 25 pilots from around the world “previewed” V/STOL handling qualities in the X-14 prior to making test flights in other V/STOL designs. The single X-14 continued flying for nearly a quarter century before being retired to the Army Aviation Museum at Fort Rucker, Alabama. It is currently in storage at a private collection in Indiana.

Fastest Flight: 172 mph
Highest Flight: 18,000 feet (approx)

Bell 65 VTOL

The Bell 65 VTOL was built to test the practicability of rotatable turbojets providing thrust for both lift and forward propulsion. Two turbojets, which raised it off the ground for take-off, could be turned 90 degrees in the air to provide forward thrust, leaving the fixed wing to provide lift.

Bell 65 VTOL Article

Constructed largely from existing parts, power was provided by two 1000 lb thrust Fairchild J44 turbojets and one Continental-Turbomeca Palouste compressor.

Control at low-speed being obtained from compressed-air jets at the tail and wingtips fed by the Palouste.

Engines: two x 1000 lb thrust Fairchild J44 turbojet
Wingspan: 26 ft
Wing area: 130 sq.ft approx.
Length: 21 ft
Loaded weight: 2200 lb approx.

Bachem Ba349 Natter (Viper)

In August, 1944, that the idea of “Natter” (German for Viper) was conceived and four designers, Heinkel, Junkers, Messerschmitt and Bachem, were directed to submit plans. Diplomeur Ingenieur Erich Bachem who made his first appearance with his submission of the BP(Bachem Projekt)20 Natter (Adder). The BP-20 was envisioned as a small lightweight expendable interceptor, capable of destroying any enemy bomber using the least possible weapon expenditure. Dr. Bachem’s design was chosen and in November of that year Natter BP-20 was flown for the first time. Smaller than the Me-163 (span, 13 feet; length, 20 feet, 6 inches) and simpler to build (wooden airframe required only 600 man hours) it looks more like a mock-up than a full-fledged fighter. Because of the short take-off area required it was well suited to close defense of vital targets and pilots required very little training. Launched from a nearly vertical ramp, powered by a Walter rocket unit similar to that used in the Me-163, the initial rate of climb was calculated at 37,000 feet per minute, its top speed at more than 600 miles per hour. A controlled missile until within a mile of its target, the pilot then takes over, jettisons the nose cone exposing 24 Fohn 7.3 caliber rockets which are fired in one salvo. Protected by exceptionally heavy cockpit armor and presenting a small head-on target, the pilot is virtually invulnerable to enemy fire. His principal danger is in take-off and descent. Going into a dive after two minutes or less in the air he bails out and a section of the fuselage containing the rocket unit likewise descends by parachute. It was the first vertical-takeoff fighter ever built and certainly the first where the pilot was expected to bail out on every mission.

That project had its origin in a proposal in 1939 by rocket engineer Dr. Werner von Braun. This proposal was rejected as unworkable by the Reichluftfahrtministerium (RLM-German Air Ministry) but found an enthusiastic supporter in Bachem who tried, and failed, to generate interest in several different proposals for a rocket interceptor along the lines suggested by von Braun.
The airframe was comparatively crude, largely of wood construction and was to be built without the use of gluing presses or complex jigs. Most parts could be made in small woodworking shops through Germany, without interfering with the existing needs of the aircraft industry. According to Bachem, only 600 man-hours would be required for the production of one airframe, excluding the rocket motor, which was relatively simple to manufacture when compared to a sophisticated turbojet. This motor was the same basic engine used in the Me-163 Komet interceptor, a Walter 109-509A-1 that used the reaction between two chemicals, T-Stoff (a highly caustic solution of concentrated hydrogen peroxide and a stabilizer) and C-Stoff (a mixture of hydrazine hydrate, methanol alcohol, and water) to provide 3,740 lb (1,700 kg) of thrust. Extra power for lift-off was generated by four 1,102 lb thrust solid-fuel rocket boosters bolted to the rear fuselage giving a combined thrust of 4,800 kgf (47 kN or 10,600 lbf) for 10 seconds.

The short, untapered, stubby wings had no ailerons, lateral control being exercised by differential use of the elevators mounted on a cross-shaped tail augmented by guidel vanes positioned in the exhaust plume of the main rocket. The cockpit was armored and armament consisted of 24 unguided Henschel Hs 217 Föhn 73 mm rockets mounted in tubes in the nose of the aircraft and covered by a nose cone.
The cockpit was equipped with only basic instruments, the instrument panel actually serving as the pilot’s frontal armour. The pilot was protected by armour on each side of the seat, and a rear armoured bulkhead at his back separated the cockpit from the fuel tanks, which contained 6gal of a hydrogen peroxide and oxyquinoline stabiliser solution and 41.8gal of 30 per cent hydrazine hydrate solution in methanol.
In operation, the Natter would be launched from a 79 ft (24 meter) tower. Guide rails would stabilize the wingtips and lower tailfin until the tower was cleared. (Towards the end of the war, as steel became scarce, the tower was replaced with a simple 29 ft [9 meter] wooden pole with a pair of shortened launch rails bolted to it. There was the need for a solid concrete foundation into which the gantry could be secured, though the wood pole version could be quickly dismantled and removed from a mounting set into such a base.) Controls would be locked during launch. About 10 seconds after launch, the solid-fuel boosters would burn out and be detached by explosive bolts and the controls would become operational. The aircraft’s autopilot would be controlled from the ground by radio; the pilot could assume manual control at any time. The Natter would accelerate upward with a proposed climb rate of 37, 400 ft (11,563 meters) per minute until it reached the altitude of the Allied bomber formations which could range from 20,000 ft to 30,000 ft (6,250 meters to 9,375 meters). The pilot would then take control of the Natter, steer it in close, jettison the nose cone, and fire all 24 of the rockets simultaneously at the bomber. The rocket fuel would be exhausted by now and the pilot was to glide downward to about 4,500 ft(1,400 meters). He would then release his seat harness and fire a ring of explosive bolts to blow off the entire nose section. A parachute would simultaneously deploy from the rear fuselage and the sudden deceleration literally throw the pilot from his seat. The pilot would activate his own parachute after waiting a safe interval to clear the bits of falling Natter. Ground crews recovered the Walter motor to use again but the airframe was now scrap. It was also envisioned that the Natter could be used on the remaining surface fleet with an air defense capability previously denied to ships.
Bachem now pulled strings to get his proposal accepted. The strings that he pulled belonged to Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler, head of the Shutzstaffel (SS-Protective Staff). Himmler saw the possibility of establishing a fleet of aircraft beyond the control of the Luftwaffe and the RLM and signed an order for 150 of Bachem’s machines using SS funds. Alarmed, the RLM now approved Bachem’s design and placed their own order for 50 of the aircraft under the designation Ba-349 Natter (Adder).
With orders from both the Luftwaffe and the SS Führungshauptamt (Planning Office), Bachem set up a factory to design and build his dream at Waldsee in the Schwarzwald (Black Forest) about 25 miles (40 km) from the Bodensee (Lake Constance). Wind-tunnel models which were built early in the program were shipped off for testing and the only results returned to the Bachem designers were that it would be satisfactory up to speeds of about 685 mph (1,102 km/h).
An initial series of 50 Natters was built within three months of the launching of the project, and unpowered gliding trials began in November 1944.
The first successful pilotless launch was accomplished on December 22, 1944, with a dummy in the cockpit. A Heinkel He-111 bomber carried one to 18,000 ft (549 meters) and released it. The pilot found the aircraft easy to control. At 3,200 ft (1000 meters), he fired the explosive bolts and the escape sequence worked as designed.
A powered vertical launch failed on December 18 because of faulty ground equipment design. On December 22, the aircraft made its first successful launch with the solid fuel boosters only because the Walter motor was not ready. Ten more successful launches followed during the next several months. Early in 1945, the Walter engine arrived and the Natter launched successfully with a complete propulsion system on February 25, 1945, carrying a dummy pilot. The launch proved that the complete flight profile was workable. All went according to plan, including recovery of the pilot dummy and Walter rocket motor.
Although Bachem wanted to conduct more pilotless tests, he was ordered to begin full power piloted trials immediately. On February 28, 1945, a volunteer, Oberleutnant Lothar Siebert, attempted the first manned, full power Natter launch. However, the cockpit canopy detached itself at an altitude of 1,650 ft because of improper locking. Siebert was knocked unconscious as the Natter continued to climb to 4,800ft before nosing down and crashing, with fatal consequences. More pilots volunteered to fly and the Bachem team launched three flights in March.
Manned flights continued, seven of them, but only 36 of the 200 Natters ordered were completed.
Altogether 25 Natters actually flew, though only seven of the flights were piloted, in April 1945 ten Natters were set up at Kirchheim near Stuttgart to await a chance to intercept Allied bombers. However, Allied tanks arrived at the launching site before the bombers appeared, and the Natters were destroyed on their ramps to prevent their capture.
French tanks advanced into Waldsee on April 1945 and a great number of spare parts from the Bachem factory were captured. Only a few days before the French arrived, fifteen rocket engines destined for Nattern had been thrown into Lake Waldsee to prevent their capture. The secret was not well kept however and all were later recovered.
A B model Natter, with revised armament and an auxiliary cruise chamber in the engine to increase powered endurance from 2.23min to 4.36min, was in the works at the end of the war. Three Ba 349Bs were built before VE Day, but only one was test flown.
Only two authentic Nattern survive. One is at the Deutsches Museum in München (Munich), restored in the colors and markings of one of the unmanned test aircraft. The Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum in Washington DC has the other Natter which was captured by U. S. forces at the war’s end and shipped it to Freeman Field, Indiana, for analysis. The captured equipment number T2-1 was assigned to the Natter and the US Air Force transferred it to the National Air Museum (now NASM) on May 1, 1949.

Gallery

Ba 349
Engine: One Walter HWK 509A rocket + 4 solid rocket boosters, 16.7 kN (10,600 lbf)
Launch weight: 800 kg (1940 lb) (empty), 2,232 kg (4,920 lb) (full load)
Length: 6.02 m (19 ft 9 in)
Height: 7 ft 4.5 in
Wing span: 3.60 m (11 ft 10 in)
Wing area: 51.6 sq.ft
Speed: 1,000 km/h (620 mph)
Range: 6 min of flight
Flying altitude: 14,000 m (46,000 ft)
Warhead: 24x 73 mm Hs 217 Föhn rockets or 33x 55 mm R4M rockets

Ba 349A
Powerplant: one 1700 kg (3,748 1b) thrust Walter 109 509A 2 liquid fuel rocket motor (of 70 sec power duration) and four 1200 kg (2,646 lb) thrust Schmidding 109 533 solid fuel jettisonable booster rockets (of 10 sec power duration).
Max speed: 800 km/h (497 mph) at SL / 560 mph at 16,400ft
Service ceiling: 14000 m (45,930 ft)
Initial ROC: 11140 m (36,550 ft)/min.
Radius of action: 40 km (24.8 miles).
Launch Weight: 2200 kg (4,850 lb).
Wing span: 3.60 m (11 ft 9.75 in)
Length: 6.10 m (20 ft 0 in)
Wing area: 2.75 sq.m (29.6 sq.ft)
Armament: 24 Fohn 7.3 cm (2.87 in) unguided rocket projectiles in nose.

Ba 349B-1
Engine: One 4,409 lb (2,000 kg) st Walter HWK 509C 1 bi fuel rocket motor, plus (for take off) four 1,102 lb(500kg) or two 2 205 lb (1,000 kg) Solid fuel rockets.
Wing span: 13 ft 1.5 in (4.00m).
Length: 19 ft 9in (6.02 m).
Wing area: 50.59 sq.ft (4.70sq.m)
Gross weight: 4,920 lb (2,232 kg).
Max endurance: approx 4 min.
Crew: 1
Initial ROC: over 37,000 ft (11,280 m)/min.
Max speed: 620 mph (1000 kph) at 16,400 ft (5,000 m).

Avro Canada VZ-9V Avrocar

The Avrocar was the brainchild of John Frost, an aeronautical engineer at the Malton-Toronto plant of Avro Canada, who conducted studies in the early 1950s on extremely unorthodox vertical-take-off aircraft, beginning with one design that looked like a shovel blade named the “Avro Ace” or “Project Y-1”. and then moving on to saucer-shaped aircraft, originally designated “Project Y-2”. Frost felt that such vehicles could offer vertical take-off capability as well as high-speed forward flight.

The US military became interested, leading to the award of a US Air Force contract in 1955 for experimental development that evolved through various designations such as “Project Silver Bug”, “Weapons System 606A (WS-606A)”, “Research Project 1194”, and so on. The whole project was originally kept a deep secret since it was felt to be a major potential breakthrough. After considering and eliminating a number of different configurations, the effort focused on development of a proof of concept vehicle named the “VZ-9-AV Avrocar” which was funded by both the US Army and US Air Force. It looked very much like an ordinary but greatly scaled-up modern “Frisbee” toy, 5.5 meters in diameter and 1.1 meters thick at the center (18 by 3.5 feet).

There was a fan 1.5 meters (5 feet) in diameter built into a duct in the center, and two little single-seat cockpits with individual clamshell bubble canopies, and powered by three Continental J69 jet engines, which were arranged in the fuselage in a triangle around the central fan. The exhausts of the jet engines drove the fan and were also ducted around the around the edge of the Avrocar to provide lift at low speed. Engine thrust could be redirected to provide forward thrust, with the saucer-shaped airframe acting as a “lifting body”. Differential thrust could be applied at the sides of the VZ 9 for control purposes.

Frost was extremely enthusiastic about the possibilities of his flying-saucer concept, envisioning an “Avrowagon” for family use, an “Avropelican” for naval use, a scaled-up transport version, and a Mach-2 fighter-interceptor version.

A wind-tunnel test model and a flying prototype were built. The test model was sent to the NASA Ames Center in California for wind-tunnel tests. First tethered flight of the flying prototype (58 7055) was at Malton on 29 September 1959, followed by the first untethered flight on 5 December 1959. After some changes to the control system, some forward flights were made just above the runway at Avro’s Malton factory, starting on May 17th, 1961.

The Avrocar was sup¬posed to fly at speeds of over 483 kph (300 mph) at altitude and have a range of 1600 km (1000 miles), but the little saucer never exceeded 30.5 m (100 ft) during trials.

Although Frost and his staff recognized that the Avrocar was inherently unstable and had incorporated an electromechanical stabilization system, it wasn’t up to the job, and once the Avrocar picked itself up to above chest height and got out of ground effect, it bobbled around drunkenly. An improved stabilization system was considered, but Avro was in chaos due to the cancellation of the “CF-105 Arrow” interceptor program. The chaos filtered down to the Avrocar program, and the US backers of the program lost interest. The program was axed in December 1961.

The flight prototype ended up on display at the US Army Transportation Museum. The wind-tunnel test model in the possession of the Smithsonian Air & Space Museum. It remains in storage at the museum’s Garber Restoration & Storage Facility in Maryland.

Aurora Flight Sciences Pegasus PAV / Boeing Pegasus PAV

Aurora Flight Sciences, an independent subsidiary of Boeing, hovered a full-size prototype of their Pegasus Passenger Air Vehicle (PAV) on 22 January 2019 at the Manassas Regional Airport in Manassas, Virginia.

Just a few months later on 4 June 2019, the Pegasus PAV crash-landed when the autoland function inadvertently entered ground mode and commanded the motors to shut down.

AgustaWestland Project Zero

The first eVTOL technology demonstrator was the Agusta Westland Project Zero hybrid tiltrotor/lift fan aircraft. It was developed to investigate the use of all electric propulsion and other advanced technologies in a vertical lift aircraft. Project Zero was approved in December 2010 and by June 2011, a full-scale demonstrator performed an initial tethered flight at Cascina Costa, Italy. The Project Zero demonstrator was not flown in forward flight.

Aerophysics VZ-7 / Curtiss-Wright VZ-7

Soon after the U.S. Army ordered two VZ 7 aerial jeep research prototypes from the Aero¬physics Development Corporation, the company was absorbed by Curtiss Wright Corporation and became its Santa Barbara Division.
The VZ 7 was originally designed as a ducted ¬fan type, like the VZ 6 and VZ 8, but it flew only with unshrouded rotors, of which it had four. This arrangement simplified the control system, since differential pitch on the rotors gave both pitch and roll control. For yaw control, a small rudder operated in the exhaust of the Turbomeca Artouste IIB shaft drive turbine.
The VZ-7 was essentially consisting a rectangular central airframe to which four vertically-mounted propellers were attached in a square pattern. The central fuselage carried the pilot’s seat, flight controls, fuel and lubricant tanks, and a single 425shp Turbomeca Artouste IIB shaft turbine engine.

Curtiss-Wright’s Santa Barbara Division (formerly the Aerophysics Development Corporation) was awarded an Army contract in 1957 for the development and initial flight testing of two prototype aircraft. Two VZ 7s (58 5508 and 58 5509) were ordered by the Army but only the first was completed and delivered to the Army in mid-1958. It flew successfully during 1959 and 1960 and served its purpose of providing general information on this type of vehicle.
The craft was capable of hovering and forward flight and proved relatively stable and easy to operate but was consistently incapable of meeting the altitude and speed requirements specified by the Army. The VZ-7 was withdrawn from service and returned to the manufacturer in mid-1960.

One of them still exists in storage at the United States Army Aviation Museum collection.

Gallery

Curtiss-Wright VZ-7
Engine: 1 x Turbomeca “Artouste” IIB turboshaft, rated at 320kW
Wingspan: 4.87m
Length: 5.18m
Height: 2.83m
Take-off weight: 952kg
Empty weight: 771kg
Max speed: 51km/h
Ceiling: 60m
Crew: 1-2