Three flight test models were built, and the aircraft became operational in 1994.
By October 2002 C-17s were being delivered at a rate of 15 per year, with a planned run of 180 aircraft. The C-17 Globemaster is a four-engine transport aircraft fitted with the reversible-thrust F117-PW-100 by Pratt & Whitney, with each of 40,000 pounds of thrust. This powerplant represents the military version of the commercial Pratt & Whitney PW2040 as found on the 757 airliner. The aircraft is designed for operations utilizing shortened runaways.
The C-17 Globemaster III is crewed by a pilot, copilot and a loadmaster. At rear of the aircraft, the C-17 features a large access ramp. The aft-loading ramp allows for transportation and delivery of varying types of cargo including over 100 fully-armed troops and paratroopers, 36 medical litters and nearly 171,000 pounds of cargo. The cargo hold is able to carry most all of the military’s air-portable weapon and vehicle systems. With in-flight refueling, the C-17 has a global reach.
Unit Cost: $237 million (2007)
The Boeing-produced C-17 Globemaster III represents one of the latest additions to the United States Air Force mobile airlift fleet. By 1998, over 140 Globemaster III’s were in active or reserve service with the USAF, Air National Guard and the Air Force Reserve.
The first Boeing C-17 Globemaster III for the RAAF, A41-206, first flew at Long Beach on 8 November 2006. The Royal Australian Air Force had four C-17 Globemaster heavy transport aircraft.
RAAF A41-206
The first, A41-206, arrived in Australia on 2 December 2006. The RAAF’s second C-17 was handed over at Long Beach on 11 May 2007 and flown to Australia a few days later.
Douglas files bankruptcy and was forced to sell at a knocked down price to McDonnell of St. Louis, which had been making handsome profits out of its F-4 Phantom, supplied to the air force in Vietnam. McDonnell-Douglas was created 28 April 1967 by merger of Douglas and McDonnell. Continued development and production of F-4 at St Louis (until 1979). On December 23,1969 received contract for F-15 Eagle air-superiority fighter, first flown July 27,1972, (first production F- 15E flown December 1986) suited to both air superiority and long-range interdiction. Evolved F/A-18 Hornet multi-mission carrier bome and land-based combat aircraft suited to fighter and attack missions (first flown November 1978, with the F/A-18E and F Super Hornet variants, first flown November 1995, placed into production by Boeing), STOVL AV-8B Harrier II and II Plus with British Aerospace for U.S. Marine Corps (first flights November 1981 and September 1992 respectively; and T-45 Goshawk naval jet trainer (first flown April 1988) from British Hawk.
Long Beach and Palmdale factories continued production of A-4 Skyhawk attack aircraft until 1979, DC-8 fourjet airliner (until the early 1970s, and in the 1980s instituted a re-engine program) and DC-9 twin-jet airliner (first tlown February 1965 and produced until the end of the 1970s, when the new designation MD-80 was adopted for developed models), and developed wide-body triple-engined DC-10 (first flown August 29,1970 and the last delivered in 1989, when replaced by the MD-11).
Purchased Hughes Helicopters January 1984, taking over that company’s range that included small helicopters and the AH-64 Apache, plus the NOTAR (no tail rotor) anti-torque system. Hughes Helicopters became McDonnell Douglas Helicopters.
Merger of McDonnell Douglas with Boeing announced in December 1996, and from August 1997 the combined company began operating as a single unit under the collective name The Boeing Company.
Boeing has sold its civil helicopter production line, formerly manufactured by McDonnell Douglas, to Dutch company MD Helicopters. The sale, coming only two years after Boeing themselves purchased the range through a merger. The sale includes the MD500, 520N, 530F and 600N models, as well as the twin-engined MD Explorer and the licence to incorporate the no tail rotor (NOTAR) system on future aircraft. Boeing does, keep the ownership of the NOTAR technology. Boeing was to continue to produce the machines, under contract to the new Dutch owners, until early 2000.
In the early 1960s Lockheed, McDonnell and North American were each vying for a military utility aircraft con¬tract and built commercial derivatives of their Air Force offerings to enter into the bizjet market.
First flown on 11 February 1959, the prototype was powered by 3250 lb Westinghouse J34 turbojets. They were to be replaced by newer 2900 lb Pratt & Whitney J60s.
The four engine McDonnell Model 220 only saw service as a one of a kind corporate barge for McDonnell executives.
The Model 119/220 was the first business, non-airline-type jet aircraft to receive an FAA Class I provisional type certificate as airworthy in the transport category.
Max take-off weight: 20560 kg / 45327 lb Empty weight: 10529 kg / 23213 lb Wingspan: 17.55 m / 57 ft 7 in Length: 20.27 m / 66 ft 6 in Height: 7.21 m / 23 ft 8 in Wing area: 51.10 sq.m / 550.04 sq ft Max. speed: 901 km/h / 560 mph Cruise speed: 837 km/h / 520 mph Ceiling: 13685 m / 44900 ft Range: 3765 km / 2340 miles
The low wings are swept back at 45 degrees, swept-back tail surfaces and 23 degrees anhedral on the one-piece all-moving tailplane. The wings have a ‘dog-tooth’ leading edge and dihedral on the outer panels which fold upwards for stowage. The ailerons move only down and are supplemented by spoilers on the upper surface of each wing. Trailing-edge flaps and small leading-edge flaps are blown. The tricycle undercarriage has a single wheel on each main unit and twin wheels on the nose unit. The mains retract inward into the wings and the nose wheels retract rearwards. A fire-control radar is in the nose, with infra-red equipment in a small bulge underneath.
The first flight for the F4H-1 Phantom prototype came on 27 May 1958. This aircraft differed from the 1955 mock-up mainly in the flying surfaces and around the jet intakes.
To protect against suspected lateral instability, the outer panels of the wings were canted upwards and the anhedral already planned for the tailplanes was increased. The jet intakes were enlarged and the edges cut back from the top to bottom.
The sixth Phantom protype (BuNo 143391) was used for initial catapult launching testing.
sixth Phantom prototype (BuNo 143391) Feb 1960
By February 1960 a second missile had been added with an IR sensor, and an AAA-4 seeker was fitted under the radome of the F4H-1’s 24in antenna APQ-50 search radar.
In late 1959, after it had been relieved of primary test responsibilities by the four remaining RTD&E airframes, the first Phantom far assigned to Project ‘Top Flight’, for a manned aircraft altitude record. On 6 December 1959 it reached 98,557 ft, breaking the previous Russian record by more than 4000ft.
Operation Top Flight
Powered by two 7711kg afterburning thrust General Electric J79-GE-8 engines. The first Phantom attained a speed record of 2585km/h on 22 November 1961, and a low-altitude speed record of 1452km/h on 20 August 1962.
During the testing of early Phantoms, some problems had been encountered with the original design of the intake, and in an attempt to improve airflow at all speeds a number of different configurations were tried. Here the splitter plate has been enlarged and the rake in the leading edge eliminated.
Of the 47 F4H-1/F-4As, 27 were assigned to test duties, the remainder going to training squadrons.
Eleventh Phantom BuNo 145310 with another variation in splitter plate and intake leading-edge design, and extended cooling intake behind radome which replaced NACA-style flush inlet of earlier prototypes.
The first squadron to receive F4H-1s was the ‘Grim Reapers’ of VF-101. The eleventh prototype was re-assigned from RTD&E to Det A of VF-101 in 1961.
Aircraft 145310 in August 1951 was in Operation Sageburner, a high-speed, low altitude, cross-country test run from San Diego, California, to NAS Oceana, Virginia.
Operation Sageburner
Aircraft 145310 was again on test duties in June 1963, by now designated F-4A.
Aircraft 145310 June 1963
The F-4B differed from the -A with a larger radar, the 32in-diameter APQ-72 introduced on a few F-4As, became standard, along with the requisite larger radome; the back seat was raised; and the entire canopy redesign was altered to give better forward vision for both crewmen. F-4Bs were also fitted with uprated engines, J79-GE-8s, in place of the -A’s -2s.
F-4B BuNo 149449
F-4B BuNo 149449 was assigned Project ‘High Jump’ to break the world’s time-to-climb records. During April 1962 new records were set at all eight recognised height increments between 3000 and 30,000m, reaching 30,000m in 371.43 seconds.
Production of the F 4B amounted to 649 aircraft. A large number of the F 4Bs have since been updated to F 4N standard
The RF-4B reconnaissance derivative served only with the US Marine Corps. The RF-4B was the second photo reconnaissance version of the Phantom, being a standard F-4B fitted with the nose developed for the Air Force F-4C. The first was RF-4B BuNo 151975t.
RF-4B BuNo 151975t March 1965
Photo Phantoms exchanged the large APQ-72 for a smaller APQ-99 radar.
The USAF reached an agreement with the Navy to take 27 more F-4Bs off the assembly line, all to be re-designated F-4C. A series of changes to the basic F-4B were implemented to make the Phantom more suitable for land-based service. These included larger, low-pressure mainwheel tyres (necessitating the thickening of the wing root) and the fitting of full dual controls and cartridge starters. The Navy retractable refuelling probe was replaced by a receptacle behind the cockpit.
The fourth F-4C 63-7410 on 27 Jan 64
The F-4C (F-110A) Phantom was the initial version for the USAF. The USAF’s Phantom II program was first designated F-110A Spectre but this name was later dropped and the USAF’s Phantom II was designated F-4C. The USAF F-4C made its first flight on May 27, 1963, and production deliveries began in November 1963 and the F-4C became operational with the 12th and 15th Tactical Fighter Wings at MacDill AFB, Florida, in January 1964. The F 4C was powered by J79 GE 15 engines.
Although very similar to the US Navy’s F-4B, it included some slight differences to make the aircraft suitable for air force use. Some of the items are: 1. The probe-and-drogue method of in-flight refuelling favoured by the US Navy was discarded in favour of the standard USAF boom’ method. 2. Full flying controls and instrumentation were duplicated in the rear cockpit. 3. In order to allow use from un-sophisticated airfields an anti-skid braking system was fitted, which included the use of thicker main-wheels. 4. The USAF version could carry a greater variety of external wea¬ponry.
The aircraft has flown a lot of combat mission in South-East Asia during the Vietnam War and has claimed 277 air-to-air combat victories.
During the Vietnam War in 1967 production was 72 Phantom IIs a month. 583 F 4Cs were built. 40 were transferred to Spain.
The service-test YRF-4C (YRF-110A) led to the RF-4C (RF-110A), 499 of which were constructed for the photo-reconnaissance role. Consideration was given to the possibility of developing a reconnaissance configured variant of the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom at an early stage in the type’s operational career, but it was not until the US Air Force selected, the basic fighter model to equip Tactical Air Command units that this proposal began to move ahead rapidly. Known by the designation RF-4C, the resulting aircraft flew in prototype form for the first time on 8 August 1963, the last of which was formally handed over to the USAF over 10 years later, on 16 January 1974.
Easily recognised by the modified nose section which contains cameras and other reconnaissance sensors, the RF-4C entered operational service at Shaw AFB, South Carolina, in September 1964, although nearly a year passed before the first unit could be considered as combat ready. When that milestone was reached, overseas deployment followed quickly, aircraft being dispatched to South East Asia for combat duty by the end of 1965, and the RF-4C remaining in use as the principal tactical reconnaissance tool for the remainder of the Vietnam War.
The second reconnaissance model to appear, designated RF-4B, was intended specifically for service with the US Marine Corps and this made its maiden flight on 12 March 1965 with deliveries to El Toro, California, following just two months later. A total of 46 RF-4Bs was supplied to this service, and were the subject of modification and life-extension programmes.
By the mid-1960s, the Phantom was just about the best-known fighter in the world. On 2 January 1967 in Operation ‘Bolo’, F-4Cs of the 8th TFW under Colonel Robin Olds shot down seven North Vietnamese MiGs. Increasingly, F-4Ds took over from the Republic F-105 the job of bringing ordnance to bear on Vietnamese ground targets.
F-4 Phantom IIs in Israeli service are claimed to have shot down 116 aircraft during a number of conflicts.
Some F 4Cs were converted into EF 4Cs under the ‘Wild Weasel’ programme to suppress enemy weapon radar systems.
The F-4D differed from the -4C externally only in having a slightly larger nose cross-section, in order to house the new APQ-109 radar with its improved air-to-ground capability. A new weapons release computer and 30kVA generator occupied the forward fuselage fuel cell, reducing fuel capacity and range.
The F-4D Phantom fighter-bomber introduced a capability to deliver precision-guided munitions (PGM), or ‘smart’ bombs. Some 825 were built, including 32 delivered new to Iran and 36 transferred to South Korea.
On 28 March 1974, the Royal Hellenic Air Force received the first of 38 F-4 Phantom IIs ordered.
Once in action in Vietnam in 1965, the Phantom seemed to need a gun to augment its missile armament in close-quarter battles with MiGs. The SUU-16/A 20mm external gun pod was an interim measure. The F-4E, first flown on 7 August 1965, introduced the 17,900 lb thrust (with afterburning) General Electric J79-GE-17 engines but its principal change was the internally-mounted M61A1 20mm cannon. The F-4E established a 2.5-to-1 kill advantage over North Vietnamese MiG-17, MiG-19 and MiG-21 fighters. Armament is one 20 mm M61A 1 multi barrel cannon and eight air to air missiles or up to 16,000 lb (7,250 kg) of ground attack weapons.
The F-4E became the definitive Phantom, and 1,397 rolled off the line. Examples were supplied to Australia (on loan), Greece, Iran, Israel, Turkey, South Korea and West Germany. The RF-4E was an export reconnaissance derivative, supplied to Greece, Iran, Israel, Japan and West Germany.
As well as producing reconnaissance Phantoms for the home market, McDonnell Douglas also developed the RF-4E variant, initially in response to a Luftwaffe requirement for 88 aircraft to undertake this mission. Flown for the first time on 15 September 1970, the RF-4E subsequently also joined the air arms of Greece, Iran, Israel, Japan and Turkey, just over 160 aircraft of this type being built before production ceased.
The RF 4E reconnaissance version and the F 4M RAF version carrys the service designation FGR.Mk 2.
The F-4F was a specialised air superiority version for the West German Luftwaffe, and 175 were delivered. The F-4G designation had been used initially for 12 aircraft taken from the US Navy F-4B production line. They had the two-way ASW-21 data-link system for automated carrier landings, and all later reverted to F-4B standard. In the 1970s, the F-4G appellation was used again for the US Air Force’s ‘Advanced Wild Weasel’ electronic warfare aircraft, 116 of which were converted from F-4E standard. Originally seen as a counter to enemy SAM missile sites and associated radars, the F-4G now carries out a wide portfolio of electronic missions. Aircraft are stationed as far afield as the 3rd TFW Clark Field, Philippines, and 52nd TFW, Spangdahlem AB, West Germany.
The F-4J was an improved production fighter for the US Navy with 8119kg afterburning thrust J79-GE-10 engines, enlarged wing and improved avionics.
On the 1st of November 1968, Japan signed a letter of agreement with Mc Donnell Douglas and it was also announced that it would become one of the few countries worldwide that was going to license-produce this aircraft. Over the following years, the Nihon Koku Jietai (Japan Air Self-Defence Force) received a total of 154 F-4EJ and RF-4Es. The F-4EJs (the export version for Japan) were mostly similar to the F-4Es, although the Japanese aircraft had their in-flight refuelling and ground-attack capabilities removed to align with Japan’s defensive posture, the F-4EJs were delivered without the AN/AJB-7 bombing computer system.
The first two F-4EJs (JASDF serials 17-8301 and 17-8302) were built by McDonnell Douglas in St Louis and first flew on January 14, 1971. The next 11 F-4EJs (JASDF serials 27-8303/8307, 37-8307/8310, and 47-8311/8313) were built by McDonnell Douglas in kit form and were assembled in Japan by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. The first Japanese-assembled aircraft (27-8303) flew on May 12, 1972. Subsequently, Mitsubishi built all the rest 127 F-4EJ during the following nine years. The last example was delivered to the JASDF on May 20, 1981. This was the last F-4 ever built in the world.
Japan also acquired 14 RF-4Es built by McDonnell Douglas to serve in the reconnaissance role. These RF-4Es were delivered between November 1974 and June 1975. They were virtually identical to the USAF RF-4C, with the only differences being the deletion of certain equipment such as the radar homing and the warning suite which had not been released for export to Japan.
The F-4EJs entered service with the JASDF in August 1972 with a total of six squadrons operating the aircraft: the 301st, 302nd, 303rd, 304th, 305th and 306th squadrons. The RF-4Es equipped the 501st that had previously operated one of the less-well-known Sabre models, the RF-86F.
Mitsubishi was the prime contractor in a modernization programme for up to 110 of the JASDF’s fleet of F-4EJ Phantoms. Known as the F-4EJKai, the prototype updated aircraft flew in July 1984. Improvements include installation of a Westinghouse AN/APG-66J pulse-Doppler radar, a Kaiser/VDO headup display, a Litton LN-39 inertial navigation system, and a J/APR-4Kai radar warning receiver. The F-4EJKai will have a look-down capability, armed with AIM-9L Sidewinders and AIM-7F Sparrows, and will also be able to carry two ASM-1 anti-shipping missiles. Funding for the first eight production F-4EJKai conversions was authorised in the FY1987 budget. Aircraft not covered by the upgrade programme will be converted later to RF-4EJ reconnaissance fighter stan¬dard.
Israel Aircraft Industries has flown a prototype conversion with one PW1120 turbofan and one standard J79 turbojet. This aircraft flew in July 1986, and has since been further modified and flown with two PW1120s. Flight testing continues.
An improved version of the EF 4C has been developed as the F 4G Advanced Wild Weasel, being basically a modified F 4E equipped with special electronics and carrying air to surface missiles to detect and attack early warning and weapon radar systems. The first of 116 entered service in 1978.
During its bombing attacks on North Vietnam, the USAF proved the effectiveness of the ‘Wild Weasel’ concept; that is the use of specially-equipped aircraft flying with, or slightly in advance of the main attack and tasked with destruction or suppression of hostile radars, particularly those associated with SAM and AA gun guidance, Republic F-105G Thunderchiefs performed well in this role in the early 1970s and 35 FAC Phantoms were similarly converted in 1968-9, but when the specification for an Advanced ‘Wild Weasel’ aircraft was drawn up in 1975 the F-4E variant of the Phantom was selected as the basis for modification. Already established as one of the world’s most effective interceptor and fighter-bomber aircraft, the Phantom took to the mission with ease, becoming the McDonnell Douglas F-4G ‘Wild Weasel’ in the process. First requirement of a ‘Wild Weasel’ is to locate and classify enemy radars. This is undertaken by a McDonnell Douglas AN/APR-38 radar homing and warning system (RHAWS), the principal external features of which are a receiver and computer pod beneath the nose (replacing the Vulcan rotary cannon) and 56 antennae in a small fintip pod, on the fin sides, upper fuselage and other locations. Three cathode-ray tube displays in the rear cockpit (backed by digital readouts, aural warning system and indicator lights) provide the electronic warfare officer with a detailed picture of the tactical situation and automatically allocate attack priorities to the 15 most pressing threats in order of the danger which they represent. Weapons delivery is also aided by computer, allowing the F-4G to attack its target ‘blind’ with bombs, anti-radiation missiles and the latest AGM-65D Maverick which has infra-red TV-type guidance. There were 116 conversions to F-4G, these aircraft entering service in 1978 and including 24 based at Spangdahlem, West Germany, with the 81st RFS/52nd TFW for operations on the NATO Central Front.
The F-4K was developed for the UK’s Royal Navy and the F-4M for the Royal Air Force, though both were operated by the RAF which, with expanded commitments following the 1982 Falklands war, has also inherited 15 ex-US Navy F-4Js.
Those supplied to the Royal Navy (F-4K) were powered by Rolls Royce Spey turbofan engines. Two versions of the Rolls Royce Spey-powered Phantom entered service with the Royal Air Force. The FG1 (the version also used by the Royal Navy) in the interceptor role and the FGR2 in the ground attack and tactical reconnaissance role in Germany. From 1977, all the Royal Air Force Phantoms were used exclusively as interceptor fighters over United Kingdom air-space.
Originally, adapting F-4B to smaller British carriers seemed to require only a change from GE J79 to RR Spey engines would be needed. By 1964, more modifications were required including drooped ailerons to slow landing speed, extended wing area and fuel capacity and others. These delayed closing the deal to reconfigure feasibility and costs.
Great Britain bought fifty two Phantom FG1s and 118 Phantom FGR2s.
With the deployment of Phantoms to the South Atlantic in 1982 an additional order for 15 Phantoms was placed. These were second hand United States Navy F-4Js fitted with General Electric F-79 engines. After an extensive refurbishment and the fitting of some British equipment they were designated F-4J(UK).
The collapse of the threat from the Eastern Europe led to an accelerated run down of the Phantom fleet and the last unit disbanded at the end of September 1992.
The German Luftwaffe was the biggest operator of the Phantom flying the F-4F ICE upgrade until the Eurofighter takes over its air defence role. Turkey and Greece were also still flying the F-4, their F-4E aircraft undergoing extensive upgrade work. Turkey was upgrading them to F-4E/2020 Terminator in cooperation with IAI. The Greek Air Force (HAF) upgrade program is known as Peace Icarus I&II and covered 40 aircraft. They also operated a number of RF-4 photo reconnaissance aircraft.
The Air National Guard was the last US operator of the F-4 until retirement in 1995/1996.
The EF-4B designation went to one airframe used for ECM training, and two modified, development airframes bore the NF-4B designation.
The F-4N is an upgraded ‘rebuild’ of the F-4B, and has in turn been converted to the QF-4N drone. The F-4S is an upgraded F-4J with wing manoeuvre slats and was the final Phantom variant to serve aboard an aircraft carrier, with VF-151 and -161 aboard the USS Midway.
Production ended in America after more than 5,050 had been delivered.
Operators: US Air Force, US Navy, US Marine Corps, Germany, United Kingdom, Turkey, Greece, Spain, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Australia, Japan, South Korea
By March 2000, 336 F4E and F4G airframes – most at Davis Monthan AFB, Arizona – had been identified for conversion to drones. The newer “G” and “E” models were chosen because their airframes typically have time remaining before USAF-regulated depot maintenance would be required for safe flight.
The fighters are flown to Mojave, Calif, where BAE Systems removes certain equipment and installs a drone autopilot, new computers, improved navigation systems and an onboard destruction package. Tails and wingtips are painted orange for easier visual acquisition during live-fire missions. Converting each F4 to a drone configuration costs approximately $2 million. Once QF-4s arrive it Tyndall AFB, they are classified in one of three roles: A manned flyer, flyable-storage drone, or a mission-ready drone. Some are sent to an 82nd ATRS detachment at Holloman AFB, N.M., to support Army and other aerial target requirements.
About 14 QF-4s are maintained as “manned” aircraft and flown regularly by USAF and Lockheed Martin pilots for mission rehearsals, proficiency and pilot upgrades.
Tyndall Air Force Base, Fla. (AFNS) — The 82nd Aerial Target Squadron received the last of the “new” QF-4 aerial targets on 19 November 2013.
The QF-4, Aircraft 68-0599, spent more than 20 years in the Air Force “Boneyard” at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., before being brought back to life for one last mission.
The supersonic, reusable QF-4 provides a realistic full-scale target for air-to-air weapons system evaluation, development and testing. Since the QF-4 replaced the QF-106 in 1998, more than 300 found a new purpose. The Phantoms began returning to work after the 309th Aerospace Maintenance and Regeneration Group reinstalled the parts to the aircrafts making them serviceable again. The next step involved contractors BAE Systems converting the F-4 to the QF-4, which would be flown remotely by highly-trained civil service pilots with an average of 4,000 flight hours.
The teamwork of contractors, civilian and military members contributed to more than 16,000 manned and 600 unmanned QF-4 missions. Ultimately, 250 of the Phantoms succeeded in their missions and been successively destroyed over the Gulf of Mexico and the ranges near Holloman Air Force Base, NM.
There are only about 60 QF-4s remaining in the program both at Tyndall AFB and Holloman AFB by the end of 2013. The limited availability of F-4s and the continuing advancement of fighter aircraft such as the F-22 Raptors are forcing a shift to the fourth generation QF-16, a converted F-16 Fighting Falcon that should be ready for use in 2014.
Production of the Phantom at St Louis eventually totalled 5057 complete machines, the last of which was flown away on Friday 26 October 1979. Eleven further F-4Ejs were provided a knock-down kits to Mitsubishi Industries in Japan, for a total of 5068 complete airframes. Japan brought the eventual total up to 5195 when the last F-4EJ was rolled out in May 1981.
F-4B (F4H-1) Engines: 2 x General Electric J79-GE-2A, 16,150 lb Wing span: 38 ft 5 in (11.7 m) Length: 58 ft 3 in (17.76 m) Height: 16 ft 3 in (4.96 m) Max TO wt: 54,600 lb (24,765 kg) Internal fuel capacity: 3665 gal External fuel capacity: 500 gal (under fuse) / 2×300 gal underwing. Max level speed: M2+.
F-4C (F-110A) Engine : 2 x General Electric J79-GE-8 (4950/7711kp), 75645 N Length : 62.828 ft / 19.15 m Height : 16.273 ft / 4.96 m Wingspan : 38.386 ft / 11.7 m Wing area : 530.019 sq.ft. / 49.24 sq.m Max take off weight : 54606.8 lb / 24765.0 kg Weight empty : 28003.5 lb / 12700.0 kg Max. speed : 1376 kt / 2548 km/h Cruising speed : 499 kt / 925 km/h Service ceiling : 70997 ft / 21640 m Cruising altitude : 40026 ft / 12200 m Wing load : 103.12 lb/sq.ft / 503.0 kg/sq.m Maximum range : 1998 nm / 3700 km Range : 1998 nm / 3700 km Range (max. weight) : 783 nm / 1450 km Crew : 2 Armament : 4x AIM 7E Sparrow III, 4x AIM 9 Sidewinder / 16,000 lb / 7250kg ext.
F-4D
F-4E Power Plant: Two General Electric J79-GE-17A axial-flow turbojets each with a normal continuous rating of 11,110 lb St (5044 kgp), a max continuous (30-mm) rating of 11,870 lb st (5 390 kgp) and an afterburner rating of 17,900 lb st (8 127 kgp) Fuel capacity, 1 225 US gal (46371) in seven bladder tanks in fuselage, 630 US gal (23851) in two integral wing tanks and up to 1,340 US gal (50721) in three drop tanks; max possible capacity, 3,333 US gal (12615 lt) Max speed, Mach= 2.17, 1,245 kts (2304km/h) at 36,000 ft (10 973 m) Max rate of climb (clean), 49,800 ft/mm (253 m/sec) Service ceiling (clean), 58,750 ft (17 907 m) Ferry range, 1,401 naut mls (2593 km) Range w/max.payload: 700 km / 435 miles Empty weight, 30,328 lb (13770 kg) Basic weight, 31,853 lb (14461 kg) Design weight (for 8.5g subsonic, 6.5g supersonic), 37,500 lb (17 025 kg) Design take-off weight (7.75g subsonic, 5.93g supersonic), 58,000 lb (26 332 kg) Max take-off weight, (5.17g subsonic, 3.95g supersonic), 61,795 lb (28 055 kg). Max. payload : 31476.4 lb / 14275.0 kg Span, 38 ft 4 in (11,68 m) Span folded, 27 ft 6 in (8,38 m) Length, 63 ft 0 in (19,20 m) Height, 16 ft 5 in (5,00 m) Undercarriage track, 17 ft 9 in (5,41 m) Wing area, 530 sq ft (49,24 sq.m) Aspect ratio, 2.82:1 Dihedral, zero on centre wing, 12 deg on outer panels Sweepback, 45 deg at quarter chord. Landing speed : 148 kt / 275 km/h Cruising speed : 504 kt / 934 km/h Initial climb rate: 29921.26 ft/min / 152.00 m/s Wing load : 114.6 lb/sq.ft / 559.0 kg/sq.m Crew : 2 Hardpoints: 9 Armament: One General Electric M61A1 multi-barrel 20-mm cannon under forward fuselage with 640 rounds. Provision for four AIM-7E-2 Sparrow missiles semi-recessed under fuselage. Centre line pylon up to 2,170-lb (986-kg) + up to 3,020-lb (1 371-kg) + four wing pylons / one AGM-45A Shrike or one Walleye ASM + inner pylons two AIM-4D Falcon or two AIM-9D or -9E Sidewinder AAMs.
F-4E(S)
F-4EJ Wing span: 38 ft 5 in (11.71 m) Max speed: M2.2.
F-4F Phantom II Engines: 2 x GE J79-GE-17A, 17,900 lb / 8119 kg thrust Span: 38 ft 7.5 in / 11.77 m Length: 63 ft 0 in / 19.20 m Height: 16 ft 5.5 in / 5.02 m Empty weight: 31,328 lb / 13,757 kg MTOW: 61,795 lb / 28,630 kg Wing area: 530 sq.ft / 49.24 sq.m Speed: 1433 mph / 2301 kph Ceiling: 58,750 ft / 17,905 m Range: 1424 mi / 2280 km Armament: 1 x 20mm Vulcan Bombload: 16,000 lb / 7257 kg ROC: 30,000 fpm / 9145 m/min Tactical radius: 700 mi / 1125 km Seats: 2
F-4G Wild Weasel’ Phantom Powerplant: two 8119-kg (17,900-1b) thrust General Electric J79-GE-17A afterburning turbojets. Maximum speed with external stores Mach 2 + Initial climb rate at maximum take-off weight 2003 m (6,570 ft per minute) Service ceiling 16580 m (54,400 ft) Combat radius 1145 km (712 miles). Empty weight 13757 kg (30,328 lb) Maximum take-off weight 28030 kg (61.795 lb) Span 11.77 m (38 ft 7½ in) Length 19,20 m (63 ft 0 in) Height 5.02 m (16 ft 5½ in) Wing area 49.2 sq.m (530 sq ft). Hardpoints: 7 Armament: up to 7258 kg (16, 000 lb)
F-4J
F-4J(UK)
F-4K (FG.Mk 1)
F-4M (FGR.Mk 2)
F-4N
F-4S
EF-4C
RF-4B
RF-4C Powerplant: two General Electric J79GE-15 turbojets, 7711-kg (17,000-lb) afterburning thrust. Maximum speed at low level 1464 km/h (910 mph) or Mach 1.19 Maximum speed at altitude 2414 kph (1,500 mph) or Mach 2.27 Ferry range 3700 km (2,300 miles) Empty weight 13290 kg (29,300 lb) Maximum take-off 26309 kg (58, 000 lb) Span 11, 71 m (38 ft 5 in) Length 19.20 m (63 ft 0 in) Height 5.02 m (16 ft 5 1/2 in) Wing area 49.24 sq.m (530 sq ft)
Initially designated XL-25 in the liaison aircraft category, then XH-35 in the helicopter class, and finally XV-1 as the first type in the new vertical lift category of aircraft designations, this machine worked on the unloaded rotor principle. Designed by Friedrich von Doblhoff, the Austrian helicopter pioneer responsible for the wartime WNF 342, the XV-1 was the result of an experimental programme undertaken jointly by McDonnell, the US Army Transportation Corps, and the USAF Air Research and Development Command.
Initiated by a Letter of Intent dated 20 June, 1951, the XV-1 project proceeded through mock-up inspection in November 1951, and the first aircraft (53-4016) was completed some 22 months later.
Combining the features of a twin-boom, twin-tail, fixed-wing aircraft with those of a single-rotor helicopter, the XV-1 was powered by a 525hp / 391kW Continental R-975-19 seven-cylinder radial. For vertical flight this engine drove two compressors which fed air through tubes to small pressure jets at the tips of the three-blade rotor, with the pressure jets operating on the principle of ignition and expansion of the fuel gases. For forward flight, the engine drove a two-blade pusher propeller mounted aft of the fuselage between the tail booms while the rotor autorotated. The XV-1 was intended to take-off and land as a helicopter, with transition from helicopter flight mode to conventional flight being made by transferring power from rotor to propeller as soon as the forward speed exceeded the stalled speed of the wing. Side-by-side accommodation was provided for a pilot and a co-pilot with room behind them for test instrumentation. Alternatively, accommodation could have been provided for a pilot and three passengers or a pilot and two stretchers.
The 9m long fuselage, mounted on skid landing gear, and mid/high-set wings mounted twin tailbooms with twin vertical surfaces (about 3m in height), inter-connected by tailplane and elevator.
The 7.9m span fixed wing featured a slight sweep on both the leading and trailing edges, although the angle of sweep was greater on the leading edge. It was also designed with a high aspect ratio and joined the fuselage at the same level as the top of the cockpit, directly below the mounting for the upper rotor. The wing terminated in the fuselage into a large bulbous housing on either side of the fuselage.
Project test pilot John R. Noll began tethered hover flights on 11 February, 1954, but difficulties with the pressure jet system delayed initial free flight until 14 July, 1954. The first successful transition from helicopter flight to conventional flight was made on 29 April, 1955. The flight test programme revealed several design deficiencies which were progressively corrected through the introduction of such modifications as a cut-down rotor pylon, small anti-torque rotors fixed to the end of each taitboom, redesigned landing skids, and other minor detail changes. During the preceding months, the second XV-1 (53-4017) had joined the flight trials programme. This machine differed from the first prototype in having a bulkier but streamlined undercarriage and cut-down rotor pylon to reduce interference drag. Numerous detail improvements, including the addition of a small steering rotor behind each boom, were progressively incorporated.
In evaluating the program, the consensus was that the basic concept was sound, but the piston engine powerplant could not provide the needed performance to optimize the design. It was felt that use of a gas turbine engine in this application would solve the problem.
Although on 10 October, 1956, the second prototype XV-1 had become the world’s first rotary wing vehicle to reach a speed of 322km/h, the gain in performance over conventional helicopters did not warrant the added complexity of the convertiplane configuration. Furthermore, the potential of the McDonnell XV-1 was seriously limited by its use of a piston engine instead of gas turbines as adopted to power European convertiplanes which preceded or followed it.
The programme was terminated in 1957 after the two prototypes had been flown for a total exceeding 600 hours. The first XV-1, 53-4016, then went to the Army Aviation Center Museum at Fort Rucker, Alabama, and the second, 53-4017, was donated to the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum, in Washington, DC.
McDonnell Aircraft Co had invested in Platt-LePage Aircraft in mid-1942, in exchange for having McDonnell personnel learn helicopter design. In 1943 McDonnell authorized Constantine M. Zakhartchenko and a small group of engineers to undertake research on design and construction of rotors. He was appraised of Platt-LePage’s preliminary work on a twin-engined, twin-rotor helicopter to meet Army requirements. Although that PL-9 design eventually proved unsuccessful in the Army competition (the AAF selected the Kellet XR-10), it fared better in a different guise as McDonnell, in return for an increase in his investment as finalized in June 1944, obtained Platt-LePage’s agreement allowing the McDonnell Aircraft Corporation to initiate the parallel development of the twin-engined, twin-rotor concept.
On the strength of both this agreement and the work accomplished by Zakhartchenko’s team, McDonnell proposed a helicopter of this design to the Navy to serve either as a testbed or as an anti-submarine warfare platform. As a testbed, the proposed Model 65 was intended to be used for the study of the effects of rotor diameter, disk loading, variations in rotor blade flap and lag angles, and other variables. In the ASW role, it was to be able to carry an adequate load of detection gear and weapons.
Considering the side-by-side rotor arrangement proposed by McDonnell to be a most suitable configuration for large helicopters capable of operating in the ASW role, the Bureau of Aeronautics issued a Letter of Intent on 15 May, 1944, covering the design, construction, and testing of one XHJD-1. This Letter of Intent was confirmed on 23 March, 1945, when Contract NOa(s)-3703 was awarded.
At the time of contract award, design of the Whirlaway, entrusted to a team led by Constantine Zakhartchenko, was well underway and ground testing was begun early in 1946. Piloted by Charles R. Wood Jr, the XHJD-1 made its first hover flight at Lambert Field, St Louis, on 27 April, 1946.
Designed to carry up to ten occupants but normally flown as a two-seater with up to 816kg of test instrumentation, the Whirlaway was fitted with twin side-by-side rotors mounted on pylons extending outboard of the engine nacelles. The nacelles, each housing a 450hp Pratt & Whitney R-985-AN-14B seven-cylinder radial engine, were attached to short wings which supported approximately 10 per cent of the gross weight during cruise and as much as 30 per cent of the weight in power-off autorotation, with consequent substantial improvement in overall performance efficiency. This feature, combined with the ability to transmit power from either engine to both rotors by transmissions and gear boxes, enabled the XHJH-1 to maintain level flight at full gross weight on the power of only one engine.
From April 1946 until June 1951, the XHJD-1 was used for numerous flying research tests including the evaluation of performance, stability balance and vibration characteristics peculiar to its twin-rotor configuration. In the process, the Whirlaway had its original 15.24-m diameter rotors replaced by rotors of varying diameters and had a braced tailplane with externally balanced control surfaces added before translation flights began. Once vibration and resonance problems with its unsynchromzed three-blade rotors were alleviated through the use of shock-absorbing rotor mounts, the XHJD-1 was considered to handle well and was flown some 250 hours without serious mishap. It was flown not only by McDonnell and Navy pilots but after being fitted with a rescue winch, was also evaluated in November 1949 by USAF pilots from the Arctic Rescue Helicopter Board.
As helicopter technology had made significant progress since development of the Whirlaway had been initiated, neither the XHJD-1 nor its proposed Model 65C development was put into production. Upon completion of its trials programme, the XHJD-1 – the first helicopter to bear the McDonnell name and the world’s first successful twin-engined, twin-rotor helicopter was donated to the National Air and Space Museum.
XHJD-1 Engine: 2 x Pratt & Whitney R-985-AN-14B Wasp Junior, 336kW / 450 hp Rotor diameter: 14.02-15.24m depending on configuration Overall span: 26.52m Fuselage length: 9.8m Height: 3.73m Empty weight: 3629kg Loaded weight: 4990kg Rotor loading: 13.7-16.2kg/sq.m Power loading: 5.5kg/hp Maximum speed at 1525m: 193 kph Cruising speed: 145km/h Rate of climb: 6.6m/s Absolute ceiling: 3930m Range: 485km
Since 1949 the McDonnell Helicopter Engineering Division had attempted to develop a rotor system capable of high-speed operation. Such a system driven by tip-mounted pressure jets had been successfully tested on the XV-1 convertiplane and its use as a pure helicopter rotor was thought to offer many significant advantages, including (1) inherent angle of attack stability; (2) increased inherent pitch and roll damping; (3) greatly improved dynamic helicopter stability; (4) ability to start and stop in high winds; (5) no need for tracking and no dampers required; (6) no possibility of mechanical instability or ground resonance; (7) very low vibration; (8) low maintenance due to absence of highly loaded bearings, reduction gears, shafting, and anti-torque rotor; and (9) automatic rotor speed control. Accordingly, McDonnell decided in December 1956 to undertake as a private venture the design, development, and testing of a small single-seat crane helicopter using the XV-1 rotor.
The mock-up of the Model 120, which was designed by a team led by Project Engineer Lloyd R. Novak, was completed in January 1957, and the first (N6081V) of two prototypes was flown on 13 November of that year by John R. Noll. This helicopter was of simple design, with the pilot seated centrally and the fuel tanks mounted on each side of the upper fuselage beneath the rotor head. Three AiResearch GTC-85-135 gas-turbine compressors, which fed pressure jets at the tips of the three-blade rotor, were located below and behind the rotor head. A wide-spaced skid undercarriage enabled large loads to be slung beneath the centre of gravity, or specialized pods to be fitted to carry up to 12 troops, firefighting equipment, or cargo containers.
In spite of some powerplant teething problems, the Model 120 demonstrated a maximum load-to-weight ratio of 1.5:1. Unfortunately, in spite of having been judged ‘one of the most outstanding helicopters evaluated to-date in its weight class’ when flown at the Naval Air Test Center, NAS Patuxent River, in September 1959, the Model 120 remained experimental as McDonnell failed to win either military or civil orders for this competent design. The termination of this programme in February 1960 marked the end of McDonnell’s independent efforts in this field as 13 months earlier the US Marine Corps had terminated the development of the XHCH-1 crane helicopter. McDonnell Douglas, however, came back to the helicopter field in 1984 with its acquisition of Hughes Helicopters, Inc.
The McDonnell Model 86 was the first helicopter specially designed for the Navy vert-rep (vertical replenishment) mission – carrying supplies and ammunition between ships—and for the Marine logistic support mission—carrying heavy loads for short distances from ship-to-shore or from marshalling areas ashore to front-line units.
Emphasis was placed during its design on extreme simplicity, ease of maintenance, and good flying characteristics while carrying underslung loads of up to 6804kg when operating at normal gross weight, or 9979kg when operating at overload gross weight. The powerplant installation, derived from that developed for the XHRH-1, consisted of two 3750eshp Allison XT56-A-2 turbines mounted atop the fuselage and providing compressed-air to the 726kg thrust McDonnell 12JP20 pressure jet at the extremity of each rotor blade. The crew of two consisted of a pilot on the starboard side and an aft-facing winch operator to port. There was no provision for carrying loads internally. Loads were to be carried externally on a sling, in a net, or in a specially-developed pod. This pod was to be fitted with a detachable tail unit to stabilize the load in flight and with large wheels to enable it to be towed on uneven ground after it had been delivered to forward bases. Consideration was also given to using the Fairchild pod which had been designed for the XC-120 twin-engined cargo aircraft.
Three XHCH-1 prototypes (BuNos 138654/138656) were ordered on 11 April, 1952, under Contract NOa(s)52-947 and a mock-up was inspected on 22 and 23 May, 1953. However, the programme was later cut back due to lack of funds. No prototypes were completed but a much revised mock-up was inspected on 15 and 16 November, 1956, and a full-scale rotor was tested on a hot-whirling bench beginning in December 1957. Additional budget cuts forced the Navy to terminate the contract on 18 January, 1959, before completion of a prototype. Nevertheless, McDonnell kept working on the Model 86 sky crane until June 1961.
XHCH-1 Rotor diameter: 19.81m Length: 11.45m Height: 5.07m Empty weight: 6749kg Loaded weight: 16026kg Maximum weight: 19051kg Maximum speed at sea level: 185km/h Rate of climb: 16m/s Hover ceiling out of ground effect: 2285m Combat radius: 37km
In 1950, after trials with the XH-20 had been terminated, McDonnell engineers remained convinced that for certain specialized applications the intrinsic simplicity of this system would outweigh its uneconomical fuel consumption rate. Hence, after failing to attract the interest of the Army in a proposed light scout and observation vehicle using a ramjet-driven rotor, they turned their attention to the agricultural market in the belief that an easily maintained, low cost helicopter would find a ready market.
As described in a specification report dated 26 September, 1950, the Model 79 was essentially similar in concept and construction to the Model 38 (XH-20) but was somewhat larger with the diameter of the two-bladed rotor being increased from 5.49m to 8.23m. It differed further from the Model 38 in having tail surfaces consisting of a fixed ground adjustable tailplane and a universally mounted movable rudder. Open accommodation was provided for a pilot, and alternate alighting gears, consisting of either a tricycle gear or twin skids, were offered. Power was provided by a pair of McDonnell 8RJ4 ramjets, one at the tip of each rotor blade, and 379 litres of fuel was carried in two tanks. For ferry purposes auxiliary tanks could be fitted to increase fuel capacity to 681 litres.
Designed as a utility helicopter, the Model 79 was intended to be used for pest or weed control, defoliation, fertilizing, seeding, or many other varied uses such as carrying mail or cargo. To that end, it could be fitted with either (1) dual liquid chemical tanks with a total capacity of 439 litres and dual spray booms; (2) dual dust or seed bins with a total capacity of 0.44cu.m and a dust outlet pointing downward and aft of the rotor disc; or (3) dual mail or light cargo bins with a total volume of 1.13cu.m. As a further alternative, the design provided for the installation, either during construction or as rapid modification kits, of cockpit floor extensions and removable plastic panels to convert the single-seat Model 79 into the two-seat Model 79A with dual controls.
Charles R. Wood Jr. first flew the single seat Model 79 demonstrator, which was registered N12M, on 26 March, 1952. Although trials proved relatively uneventful and confirmed that the basic design was sound and easy to fly and maintain, development of the Model 79 had to be abandoned in mid-1953 as the type had failed to attract commercial interest due to high fuel consumption rate and noise level.
Steve Cole 15.03.2012 My Grandfather, Willis Cole Jr. worked for McDonnell. Somehow he acquired most of Big Henry when the project was cancelled. There are pictures of it sitting in the family driveway. Up until a few years ago, the landing gear, instrument panel and a piece of the fuselage (with the N12M number) were still floating around his garage. Willis Cole Jr. passed away 3-16-2012.
Model 79 Rotor diameter: 8.23m Fuselage length: 4.72m Height: 2.54m Empty weight: 293kg Loaded weight: 816kg Maximum weight: 907kg Maximum speed: 138km/h Rate of climb: 5m/s Hover ceiling in ground effect: 1160m Service ceiling: 3050m Endurance: 62 min
Design of the Model 78 was started in 1950 in answer to a request for proposals for an assault transport helicopter which had been issued by the Navy Department on behalf of the US Marine Corps. Intended to operate from CVE-105 class (USS Commencement Bay) carriers, the new helicopter was to fit on 13.41m by 12.80m deck elevators. Its primary mission was to carry 30 troops to objectives up to 100 naut miles away and return to the carrier without the need to refuel ashore.
To fulfil what were then most demanding requirements, McDonnell designed a compound helicopter with a three-bladed rotor and short wings on which were mounted two 3507shp Allison XT56-A-4 turbines. For vertical flight, air from engine-driven auxiliary compressors was to be ducted to 726kg thrust McDonnell 12JP20 pressure jets, one at the extremity of each rotor. For forward flight, each engine was to drive a three-bladed propeller, with transition from helicopter flight mode to conventional flight being made by transferring power from the auxiliary compressors to the propellers as soon as the forward speed exceeded the stalled speed of the wing. Normal accommodation was to have been provided for a crew of two and 30 fully-equipped troops. Alternatively, accommodation could have been provided for 36 troops or 24 litter patients, or two Jeep-sized vehicles could have been carried internally. Larger loads (up to a maximum weight of 5224kg) could be carried externally. Another noteworthy design feature was the inclusion of a hydraulically-operated loading ramp in the forward fuselage, beneath the cockpit. Folding wings, rotor blades, and tail unit were to have enabled the Model 78 to fit on the deck elevators of CVE-105 carriers.
The Navy selected the McDonnell design on 15 March, 1951, and two and a half months later issued a Letter of Intent for three XHRH-1 prototypes (BuNos 133736/133738) to be built under Contract N0a(s)-51-1201. A full-scale mock-up of the XHRH-1 was inspected on 22 and 23 October, 1952, and construction of the prototypes was begun. However, after the Korean War had ended, budget cuts and concern over anticipated developmental problems led to the cancellation of the contract before completion of a single XHRH-1. All work on the project ended in April 1954.
XHRH-1 Rotor diameter: 19.81m Wingspan: 13.72m Length with rotor blades and tail folded: 16.33m Height: 5.09m Wing area: 30.84 sq.m Empty weight: 8695kg Loaded weight: 13795kg Maximum weight: 16329kg Maximum speed at sea level: 444km/h Climb rate: 12m/s Hover ceiling out of ground effect: 3050m Combat radius: 185km
