National Aerospace Laboratories Saras / Hindustan Aeronautics Saras

In mid 1980s, Research Council recommended that National Aerospace Laboratories should study the civil aviation requirements of India and recommended ways and means of establishing a viable civil aviation industry. It further recommended that NAL should carryout a formal techno economical feasibility study of a multi role Light Transport Aircraft (LTA – renamed SARAS in October 1993). The feasibility study (November 1989) showed that there was a significant demand for a 9–14 seat multi-role LTA in the country and estimated a market potential of about 250–350 aircraft in the next 10 years. NAL submitted the feasibility study report to RC in November 1990 and started its search for an industrial partner.

The project began in 1991 as a collaboration with Russia (Myasishchev had a similar project called the Duet), but financial trouble led the Russians to drop out early in the project, in 1997. The project almost came to a halt when it was hit by US-imposed sanctions in 1998, after India’s nuclear tests in Pokhran. It was recommenced in September 1999 upon receiving development approval from the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs in June 1999.

The project of ‘Saras’ was sanctioned on 24 September 1999 with initial schedule of its maiden flight by March 2001.

The original design target parameters included a maximum take-off weight of 6,100 kg and a maximum payload of 1,232 kg, a high cruise speed of over 600 km/h, an endurance of six hours, a maximum flight altitude of 12 km (cruise altitude 10.5 km), short take-off and landing distances of about 600 m, a maximum rate of climb of 12 m/s, a low cabin noise of 78 dB, a range of 600 km with 19 passengers, 1,200 km with 14 passengers and 2,000 km with eight passengers, a high ‘specific range’ of 2.5 km/kg and a low cost of operation of Rs. 5/km.

The Saras was designed to fly both day and night from semi-prepared airfields and grass runways. It was designed adhering to the FAR-25/23 standard regulations and can offer air taxi and commuter services.

The first Saras (PT1) completed its maiden flight at the HAL airport in Bangalore on 29 May 2004 powered by two 850hp Pratt & Whitney PT6A-66 turboprop.

While the designed empty weight of the aircraft is around 4,125 kg, the first prototype weighed in around 5,118 kg. This was to be addressed by including composite wings and tail by the third prototype. It is being upgraded with 1,200hp Pratt & Whitney PT6A-67A engines to accommodate the overweight, new propellers and modern flight control and electrical systems.

The airframe of Saras-PT2 was built with lighter composites to reduce its overall weight by about 400 kg from its first prototype, which was overweight by about 900 kg. The PT2 was powered by Pratt & Whitney PT6A-67A engine and completed maiden flight on 18 April 2007. A 2.65m diameter Hartzell five-bladed propeller will be fitted to each engine. The propellers can make 1,700rpm in pusher configuration.

The IAF has signed up with National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore for the purchase of 15 Saras aircraft.“NAL signed a memorand­um of understanding with IAF to sell 15 Saras aircraft. The Kanpur unit of Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd will manufacture these planes,” The 14-seater twin-engine ai­rcraft would be used for coastal surveillance as well as tr­aining young cadets on transport flying.

On 6 March 2009, 2 Indian Air Force test pilots, Wing Commander Praveen Kotekoppa and Wing Commander Dipesh Shah along with a Flight Test Engineer Squadron Leader Ilayaraja, were killed when the second prototype Saras aircraft crashed and caught fire in an open field near Bidadi, about 30 km from Bangalore. A court of inquiry found that wrong engine relight drills given to the pilots caused the crash.

Saras
Engines: 2 × Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6A turboprop, 2150 shp (1634 kW)
Wingspan: 14.70 m (48.23 ft)
Length: 15.02 m (49.28 ft)
Height: 5.20 m (17.06 ft)
Useful load: 1,232 kg (2,710 lb)
Max. takeoff weight: 7,100 kg (15,653 lb)
Maximum speed: 550 km/h
Cruise speed: 450km/h
Range: 920 km
Ferry range: 1,935km
Service ceiling: 7,500 m (24,600 ft)
Rate of climb: 10.5m/s
Endurance: 4 hours 45 minutes
Crew: 3 (Pilot, Co-Pilot, Flight Engineer)
Capacity: 14 passengers

NASA Paresev

In the summer of 1960, Neil Armstrong and Milt Thompson had heard a talk by NASA’s Langley Research Center aeronautical engineer Frank M. Rogallo. Rogallo explained the advantage of using a controllable parachute for the recovery of space vehicles.

Armstrong and Thompson asked director Paul Bikle for permission to build a simple research vehicle to test Rogallo’s concept. When Bikle refused citing commitments to the X-15 and other NASA programs, Armstrong and Thompson continued working on the design in their free time. Eventually, they arrived at a Parasev design that had a little platform slung beneath it.

Flying a Cessna L-19 on 28 June 1962, Armstrong took off with the Parasev in tow over Rogers Dry Lake and turned so sharply at the edge of the lake that the towline went slack, causing Thompson to crash land on one of the really small dry lakes east of Rogers. Armstrong was not even aware there was a problem until Bruce Peerson came into the pilots’ room and asked ‘Where’s Milt?”. From a DC-3 they saw him sitting down, shaking his fist at them. Thompson admitted “we encountered numerous problems developing a good airworthy vehicle.”

By this time, Bikle had authorised their Parasev work. Construction of the Parasev moved to Dryden’s shops, where simple light-aircraft fabrication techniques led to a functional prototype in a matter of weeks.
The first free flight was made by Thompson on 12 March 1962. Armstrong flew the vehicle on 24 September 1962. He went on to fly the Parasev on the 24th, 25th and 26th of September. They were short flights, but twenty flights.

Gus Grissom & Milt Thompson with Paresev

Between 1961 and 1965 the ability of the Rogallo wing (also called “Parawing”) to descend a payload such as the Gemini space capsule safely from high altitude to ground was studied. The Paresev (Paraglider Research Vehicle) was an experimental NASA glider aircraft based upon the kite-parachute studies by NASA engineer Francis Rogallo. The Paresev was a test vehicle used to learn how to control this parachute-wing for a safe landing at a normal airfield.

NASA experimented with the flexible Rogallo wing, which they renamed the Parawing, in order to evaluate it as a recovery system for the Gemini space capsules and recovery of used Saturn rocket stages. Data developed by NASA in the late 1950s fed both the Charles Richards team and a different Ryan Aeronautical team that produced the Fleep. The Paresev used a cantilevered cross-beam but did not use a kingpost. Under a directive by Paul Bikle, NASA engineer Charles Richards in 1961–1962 designed the collapsible four-tube Rogallo wing used in the Paresev. The Paresev series included wing configurations that were tightly foldable from the nose plate for easy transport, using initially a cloth sail and later one of Dacron.

The Paresev was controlled by moving the tensionally hung pilot’s and fuselage’s mass relative to the position of the wing. This mass-shifting was effected by tilting the wing from side to side and fore and aft by using a control stick in front of the pilot that descended from the wing above. Another version translated the same weight-shift control via cables. As the Paresev was towed in a kite mode, it usually rose from the ground at about 46 mph (74 km/h) and had a maximum air speed of about 65 mph (105 km/h).

Neil Armstrong acknowledges that controlling the glider was extremely tricky; “the acceptable centre of gravity box was pretty small, and the control forces could be surprisingly big. Its speed range was very narrow, and its L/D was substantially less than a pilot would like. Yet for a first effort, the paraglider was surprisingly successful.”

The Paresev control pendulum weight-shift control system was presaged by a published patent, an early use of the hung pilot behind a cable-stayed triangle control bar in 1908 in the territory of Breslau, and then also by the “control wing” of George Spratt in the 1920s.

The Paresev 1A and 1B were unpowered; the “fuselage” was an open framework fabricated of welded SAE 4130 steel tubing, called a “space frame”. The keel and leading edges of the wing were constructed of 2.5-inch-diameter (64 mm) aluminium tubing. The leading edge sweepback angle was held at 50 degrees by a rigid spreader bar. Additional wing structure fabricated from steel tubing ensured structural integrity.

Paresev 1-A with tow plane

The basic vehicle was slightly more than 11 ft (3.4 m) high from the top of the paraglider’s wing to the ground, while the length of the center keel was 15 ft (4.6 m). Total weight was about 600 lb (270 kg) On August 24, 1962, seven weeks after the project was initiated, the team rolled out the Paresev 1.

Paresev 1 in landing, 1962

The Paresev 1, first flight on January 25, 1962, crashed on March 14, 1962. The frame was fitted with a linen membrane wing and the control stick coming from overhead in front of the pilot’s seat.

The Paresev 1A used a rebuilt frame from the Paresev 1, but had a control stick and a Dacron membrane wing. First flown on May 18, 1962, the last flight was on June 28, 1962.

The Paresev 1B first flew on July 27, 1962 and the last flight was on Feb 20, 1963.

Paresev 1-B under aerotow

The Paresev 1C had a modified frame with a half-scale version of an inflatable parawing. The first flight was on March 4, 1963 and last flight on April 14, 1964.

Towed aloft by a helicopter, the 1C was meant to inflate at 35,000 ft.

Piloted by E.P.Hetzel

With North American test pilot E.R.Hetzel at the controls of a simulated Gemini capsule the Paresev made its first manned flight in 1965. Towed to 2600 ft by helicopter for check of the glider’s control system, Hetzel made turns during the 20.5 minute flight, landing at Edwards Air Force Base. The next test was scheduled from 12,000 ft.

The Paresev vehicle was flown 341 times during a research program that ran from 1962 until 1964. Thompson made numerous ground-tow flights and claimed about 60 air-tow flights. Peterson claimed 228 flights (ground and air tows). Grissom made two flights. Champine made four flights. Kleuver made at least eight flights. It is unknown how many times Armstrong, Hetzel, and Slayton flew.

United States Gemini’s Paresev glider in flight with tow cable.

Publicity on the Paresev and the Ryan XV-8 “Flying Jeep” aircraft inspired hobbyists to adapt Rogallo’s flexible wing airfoil onto elementary hang gliders leading to the most successful hang glider configuration in history.

Using the fully flexible parawing or the tube-stiffened paraglider of the Paresev 1A, 1B, 1C as an alternate to spacecraft recovery was deemed too unreliable upon unfolding so round parachutes for water landings were used instead. The Paresev and other flexible-wing projects such as the Ryan XV-8 stopped being funded by NASA on 1965.

The Paresev was transferred to the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum located in Washington, D.C. for display.

NASA Paresev 1A at the Udvar Hazy Center

Built and rebuilt several times, the Parasev eventually made more than 100 flights at Edwards. Among the pilots who flew it were astronaut Gus Grissom, who, during a flight at Edwards on 17 October 1962, broke its nose gear on landing. The parawing might have proven feasible for capsule re-entry but time was not available. In 1964, with both the Gemini and Apollo programs committed to water landings, NASA cancelled all of its paraglider work.

Test pilots
Milton Orville Thompson, NASA FRC
Robert Apgar Champine, NASA LRC
Neil A. Armstrong, NASA FRC
Bruce A. Peterson, NASA FRC
Charles Hetzel, North American Aviation
Maj. Emil “Jack” Kluever, U.S. Army
Donald K. “Deke” Slayton, NASA MSC
Virgil I. “Gus” Grissom, NASA MSC

Tow aircraft
Piper PA-18 Super Cub (N-68P)
Cessna O-1 Bird Dog (50-1675)
Stearman (N69056)
Boeing HC-1A helicopter (58-5515)

Crew: One pilot
Length: 15 ft 0 in (4.57 m)
Height: 11 ft 0 in (3.35 m)
Wing area: 179 ft2 (16.6 m2)
Gross weight: 600 lb (270 kg)
Maximum speed: 65 mph (100 km/h)

NASA AD-1 / Ames AD-1

Robert T. Jones of Ames calculated that an aircraft’s wing made to pivot 4 degrees to the fuselage might halve the fuel consumption. Specifications bases, in particular geometric configuration were established by NASA based on one made by Boeing. In consultation with the Rutan Aircraft Factory, Ames and Dryden built the AD-1 oblique wing aircraft in 1977, a twin jet composite aircraft with direct controls and a top speed of 175kts (324kph). Set perpendicular to the fuselage for takeoff and landing, the oblique wing could be made to rotate up to 60 degrees for higher speed flight and between 1979 and 1982, demonstrated the feasibility of such a concept, performing three landings with the wings pivoted at 45 degrees.

The test aircraft’s 32 foot wing can be pivoted 60 degrees during cruise, to reduce drag while still allowing high airspeeds. In the conventional position, the wing should provide ample lift and stability for takeoffs, landings and low speed manoeuvres. Designated the AD 1, the test aircraft is 40 feet long, has a gross weight of 2,000 pounds and is powered by two 220 pound thrust turbojets. The structure was made entirely of fiberglass.

The aircraft was delivered by Aimes at Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base in March 1979. The first flight was performed by test pilot NASA Thomas C. McMurtry December 21, 1979. Thomas flew only the 79 flights until 7 August 1982.

Although the oblique wing is still considered by some as a viable concept for large transport, unpleasant flight characteristics of the AD-1 at certain angles discouraged designers to adopt this configuration.

Gallery

Engines: 2 x Microturbo TRS-18, 220 lb / 100 kg
Wing span: 9.85 m / 34 ft 2 in
Length: 11.82 m
Wing area: 8.60 m²
Aspect ratio: 11.2
Thickness/chord: 12%
Loaded weight: 809 kg
Empty weight: 535 kg
Max speed: 220 knts
Min speed: 74 knts
Seats: 1