Saito 1912 Aeroplane

Sotoichi Saito of Tsuruoka City, Yamagata Prefecture, had been involved in the development of balloon flight since 1889. In 1910 he bought a 50hp Gnome engine from France so that he could study aero-engines. He later acquired a patent for a ‘Flying Machine’ and manufactured an aircraft resembling a Bleriot monoplane. Helping with this project was Shotaro Ueda. Single-engine monoplane. Wooden structure with fabric-covered wing and uncovered fuselage structure.

The aeroplane contained some rather innovative features. For protection against inflight fire, the fuel tank was installed on struts high above the rear fuselage at a considerable distance from the engine. Another feature was that in the event of an inflight emergency, a cable could be pulled, causing the fuselage and engine to separate from the wings leaving the pilot still seated on the wing section which was to act as a parachute.

Saito named his aeroplane the Saigai, an acronym derived from his own name. In june 1912 he tested the aeroplane on the dry bed of the Akagawa River in Tsuruoka City. The aeroplane, piloted by Suketaro Koya, was put on a special railway track for take off. Koya was probably selected because of his engine experience in operating the Mogami Maru river boat. Soon after becoming airborne, Koya felt that further flight would be risky and pulled the emergency cord, thus destroying the aeroplane. The Gnome engine was salvaged and installed in the Tamai 3 Aeroplane in 1917, in which the pilot, Seitaro Tamai, was killed. The engine then passed to Shigesaburo Torigai, and still later was installed in the Tsurubane No.2 Aeroplane of Otojiro Itoh, which made the first loop by a Japanese civil aeroplane when piloted by Toyotaro Yamagata in 1918.

Engine: 50hp Gnome
Propeller: two-blade wood
Span: 10.30m (33ft 9 1/2in)
Length: 9.10m (29ft 10 1/4in)
Loaded weight: 560kg (1,234Ib)

SAIMAN 202-M / 204

The Italian Saiman 202-M was first introduced in 1936 and participated in a number of international competitions in pre-war years. During the war the type was employed as a liaison and communications two-seat cabin monoplane by the Regia Aeronautica.

Construction is all-wood with fabric and plywood covering. The Saiman 202-M is powered by a 130 hp Alfa Romeo 110 engine.

The Saiman 204 is generally similar but is arranged as a four-seater and has a 180 hp Alfa Romeo 115 engine.

Saiman 202-M
Engine: 130 hp Alfa Romeo 110
Wing span: 35 ft 7 in
Wing area: 190 sq.ft
Length: 25 ft 3 in
Height: 6 ft 7 in
Empty weight: 1364 lb
Loaded weight: 2068 lb
Max speed: 143 mph
Cruise: 124 mph
Absolute ceiling: 16,400 ft
Range: 683 mi
Seats: 2

Saiman 204
Engine: 180 hp Alfa Romeo 115
Seats: 4

Sadler A-22 Lasa

A 1989 light-armed, twin-boom surveillance aircraft. A single place enclosed midwing monoplane with retractable undercarriage, one built, first flying on 10/8/89, registered N22AB.

Engine: 300hp Chevrolet V-6 pusher
Wingspan: 22’0″
Length: 15’8″
Useful load: 1300 lb
Max speed: 190 mph
Stall speed: 72 mph
Range: 300 mi

Sadler Radial R1765U

In 1985, Bill Sadler and Bill Gewald began searching for a reliable four-stroke engine for ultralights and homebuilts. Sadler had developed the Sadler Vampire. He went on to design Formula 1 race cars and was an instructor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Sadler teamed with the Gewalds to form the engine development company. Prior to that, the Gewalds operated two oil exploration air charter companies in Southeast Asia-one in North Borneo and the other in Singapore.

Sadler and the Gewalds began a worldwide search for an existing reliable four-stroke engine and found nothing to their liking. So they decided to invent and build one on their own.

End result was the Sadler 6-cylinder radial engine with a four-cycle, dual electronic ignition with direct drive unit. Made with up-to-date materials and using modern computer numerically designed machinery, the engine has redundancy (12 spark plugs), low rpm, minimum vibration, low fuel consumption and low noise levels.

Patent No. 5,l50,670, was issued in 1992 and a total of 43 proof-of-concept engines were built, but none were offered for sale. According to Betty the company could not support the units with spare parts. However, the engine was installed in an Avid Model C where it produced a cruise speed of 85 mph, a 1,250 fpm rate of climb at gross weight, and a service ceiling above 12,500 feet. The engine, including electric starter and alternator, weighed 121.4 pounds and the all-up weight including engine mount, exhaust manifold and propeller was 162 lbs. There are almost 500 hours of dynamometer testing and the engine has also been successfully test flow on several different aircrafts.

The Sadler Radial Engine is a compact aircraft engine. The 6 cylinder R1765U radial uses two banks of three cylinders with power pulses every 120 degrees of revolution. The design uses VW cylinders and pistons for reliable inexpensive parts. Prototype testing has proven out this radial and casting patterns have been made. The engine is ready for final pre-production development.

Bill Gewald, who developed the engine from Sadler’s design, turned 75 and together with his wife Betty feels it is about time for younger, more energetic people to take charge.

The engine package being offered to investors included drawings, CAD programs, patterns, jigs and fixtures and many parts for the 65-hp R1765U engine. In addition, preliminary engineering and feasibility studies have been completed for 85-hp and 110-hp versions. Mrs. Gewald stated that only crankshafts and cylinder heads are needed to produce completed 65-hp engines. The “R” stands for “radial”, the “17” is “1721cc” displacement, the “65” is horsepower, and “U” means “uncertified”.

“We have never been able to raise enough money to go into full production, but we have all the drawings on autocad. We also have over $17,000 worth of patterns for all the proprietary parts,” she said. “It is a reliable, smooth, compact engine with low RPM (red-line is 3000 rpm) that runs beautifully on automotive fuel and sounds like a radial. They wanted to sell to someone with the financial resources to treat the engine with the TLC it deserves, and would accept the bulk of any payment based on sales royalties and will personally help all we can in production and sales.
The company had one engine running on a stand at the Arlington Airport north of Seattle that was available for demonstration the homebuilders with scaled-down replicas and others originally produced with radial engines.
So, if there is someone or a group out there wanting the challenge of producing a well-researched, out-of-the-ordinary engine design with the time-consuming R&D and basic tooling already complete, contact the Gewalds at Sadler Radial Engines, Inc, 603 NE 9th St., PO Box 953, Coupeville, WA 98239-0953.

This engine is quiet, even without a muffler, which stems not only from the slow-working pistons, but also the noise produced by the engine is at a frequency much lower than the high whine of the two-strokes.

The R1765U has a maximum width of 20.5″, a maximum height of 19.4″, and a length of approximately 17″ depending on starting configuration, carburetion and air cleaner.

There are two rows of three cylinders each, for a total of six cylinders. This arrangement gives a firing impulse every 120º or three power pulses per revolution. Each of the two, three-cylinder rows forms a system whose instantaneous mass-center or centroid, has an approximately circular locus that is exactly balanced by the equal and opposite mass-system of its adjacent cylinder row. In plain language, we can say that one cylinder row balances the other row all of the time.

The slight offset between the cylinder rows results in a dynamic imbalance or a “rocking couple” that is resolved along the aircraft longitudinal axis by the engine mounting system and a counter-weighted crankshaft.

The radial engine has excellent air-cooling characteristics. Each cylinder is individually exposed to its own flow of cooling air without the requirement for extensive baffling and ducting. The second cooling advantage this engine has is its low per-cylinder horsepower output making cooling demands very manageable. The pistons and cylinders are standard Volkswagen, extensively machined.

Individual cylinder heads are cast in 356 aluminum alloy heat-treated to T6. Cast iron valve seat insets are cast integrally with the head. Both inlet and exhaust valves are stainless steel VW racing types for durability and component availability. They ride in bronze valve guides pressed into the cylinder head. Valve springs need only exert a pressure of approximately 26 pounds at mid travel, thereby reducing wear and tear on the valve drive train.

A 5mm deep bathtub combustion chamber is used with a 2 mm quench height area above the piston. This allows for compression a ratio of 9.5 to 1 and the use of unleaded premium auto gasoline. Two spark plugs per cylinder are used to improve reliability as well as combustion efficiency.

The valve train uses only one single small diameter cam for all inlet valves and another identical cam to drive all the exhaust valves. Each tappet housing holds all of the six inlet or exhaust roller tappets. The hardened steel cams run on ball bearing integral shafts to drive the roller tappets. The tappet housings are staggered in the rear case and drive overlapping pushrods to each rocker arm. Because the valves are arranged in line lengthwise along the engine (placing exhaust forward and inlet rearward) and the pushrods all come out of the engine rear case in a single plane, each rocker arm for a given cylinder is displaced laterally to the left or right of the cylinder centerline. This allows the front exhaust rocker arm to miss the inlet valve and spring, as well as allowing the rear rocker arm to be similarly displaced from center, making room for the inlet manifold to pass between the push rods on its way to the cylinder head inlet port.

Valve timing has a minimum of overlap and duration to maximize low-end torque and provide useful horsepower in the 2900 rpm range. Valve cam accelerations have been kept low in the interest of low valve train stress and long life.

Full pressure lubrication is supplied from a rear case mounted oil feed pump running at camshaft speed. Inlet oil to the oil pump comes directly from a remote oil tank. A four-quart oil supply is recommended. Because the cylinder bases protrude into the crankcase cavity, very little back oil finds its way into the lower cylinders.

As originally tested, the engine had two completely independent electronic distributors driven from the rear case. Their shafts are mounted with individual gears that mesh with the main crankshaft time gear. Distributors are battery-coil type. Solid-state breakerless contact points are used to drive the standard coils to achieve optimum reliability and simplicity. An interesting feature of the radial engine is that the firing order proceeds sequentially around the cylinders in a direction opposite to the crankshaft rotation.

The inlet manifold system uses a circular cyclonic plenum chamber at the rear of the engine. Separate manifolds join this chamber to each cylinder’s inlet port. The carburetor is mounted centrally on the plenum box. A heat system can be fabricated using the engine’s exhaust as the heat source.

Configuration: Direct drive, 6 cylinder, four-cycle, internal combustion, gasoline fueled, free air cooled engine, one gravity fed carburetor, and a dry sump lubrication system.

Displacement: 1721cc (105 cu in.)
HP/Torque @ 3000 rpm: 65 hp/113.4
Stroke: 50 mm (1.969 in.)
Bore: 85.5 mm (3.366 in.)
Rotation: clockwise, view from rear
Compression Ratio: 9.5:1
Option: Electric start
Accessories: oil cooler, oil tank (4 quart)
Engine weight with components (dry): 108 lb (Prop. Start)
Engine weight with electric start/alternator systems: 122 lb
Engine diameter: 20.7 in plus oil system components below engine

Performance (With 66″ 2 Blade, Wood Prop.)
Normal rated power, T.O: 62 bhp @ 2,850 rpm
Max. rated power 65 bhp @ 2,975 rpm
Continuous rated power (90%): 58.5 bhp
90% pwr fuel burn: 4.1 USgph / spc=.44 lb./bhp-hr
Typical cruise power (75%): 49.5 bhp
75% pwr fuel burnL 3.4 USgph or spc=.43 lb./bhp-hr
Idle Speed: 800 rpm

Sackett J-1 Jeanie

Mr. Horace E Sackett of Gobles, Michigan took his Piper J-3 Cub and rebuilt it circra 1955 into a low-wing, single-seat, tricycle undercarriage aircraft, which is now known as the Sackett J-1 “Special”. Still retained its 65-hp Lycoming engine, it far outperforms the Cub from which it was developed. It also retains its original registration number N33130.

At some stage it was powered by a 90hp Franklin 4AC.

Engine: 90hp Franklin 4AC
Wingspan: 23’0″
Length: 19’11”
Weight: 700 lb
Max speed: 120 mph
Cruise: 105 mph
Stall: 55 mph
Range: 200 miles

Engne: 65hp Lycoming O-145-B2
Cruise: 90 mph
Stall: 40 mph

Sack A.S.6

The odd-shaped model instantly caught the attention of Air Minister General Udet who was fascinated by the circular shape and gave Sack permission to proceed with his research with official backing. Sack immediately began construction of A.S. aero models of increasing size up to the A.S.5 which was by far the largest flying model. With a wingspan of 125 cm, length of 159 cm, and height of 65.3 cm the two-bladed propeller model took to the air and proved the soundness of the basic design.

From this point on Sack was determined to build a manned machine that would become the Arthur Sack A.S.6V-1.

The aircraft was built in Leipzig starting in January 1944 in the workshops of the Mitteldeutsche Motorwerke company. Assembly and final tuning were performed at the Flugplatz-Werkstatt workshop at Brandis air base during the same month.

Wooden construction of A.S.6V-1, January 1944

The basic structure was made of plywood while the cockpit, pilot seat, and landing gear all came from an old wrecked Me Bf 109B. The engine was taken from a Me Bf 108 Taifun, an Argus As 10C-3 of 240 hp working on an old wooden two-blade propeller.

In February 1944, the A.S.6V-1 taxi test started, piloted by Baltabol from the ATG/DFW of Leipzig. The first test proved that the rudder was not strong enough and some structural damage resulted from the test.

During the second test five separate take-off runs were attempted from the 1,200 meter landing strip at Brandis. It was soon discovered that the control surfaces failed to function properly because they were positioned in the vacuum area produced by the circular wing while taxiing. The right leg of the landing gear was damaged on the last run.

Due to war restrictions more powerful engines than the low-hp Argus were not available so the incidence angle was increased. The test pilot at this point proposed moving the landing gear back 20 cm, but due to structural reasons that could not be overcome, the modification was deemed too risky. Instead, brakes were installed from a Ju-88, 70 kg of ballast was added ahead of wing spar No.3 and the tail surfaces were increased by adding 20mm of corrugated plates.

The third test flight was performed over the 700 meter strip at Brandis on April 16, 1944. There was no wind and the plane rolled 500 meters without lifting its tail. No aerodynamic control of the empennages was achieved. The plane made a brief hop but could not get into the air.

During the fourth flight test the jump was a bit longer; however, the plane banked to the left because of torsion generated by the propeller, this being very difficult to balance in a small wingspan aircraft.

After this Baltabol lost all hope and recommended the installation of a proper Daimler-Benz engine from a current Me Bf 109 and a complete study of the basic design in an aerodynamic wind tunnel. Sack went on trying to solve the problem by himself in the traditional manner until the end of the war.

The A.S.6V-1 would have sat for the duration had it not been for the arrival of Gruppe I/JG400 at Brandis in the summer of 1944. These were the confident new Me-163 Komet pilots who had plenty of experience with difficult take-offs and landings with short wingspan aircraft. So, it was inevitable that one of them, Oberleutnant Franz Roszle, made an attempt to fly what the Gruppe named the “Bierdeckel” (Beer tray)!

His attempt, like Baltabol before him, ended with a short hop and collapsed landing gear. The Komet pilot made the same suggestion to Sack about testing the design in a wind tunnel and then turning the aircraft over to Messerschmitt for proper redesign with components of the latest Me Bf 109 fighter, including armaments. Sack refused to listen or ask any favors from the RLM. Messerschmitt got word of the A.S.6V-1 and actually proposed that a new A.S.7V-1 should be re-designated as Me-600.

The proposed Me-600 would have enlarged the circular wing considerably and featured a complete fuselage with the latest DB 605 ASCM/DCM of 2,000 hp with MW injection and a four-bladed propeller, repositioned gear, improved control surfaces, redesigned tail unit, Galland hood, and six MK-108 cannon buried in the reinforced circular wing! With wind tunnel data corrections and Messerschmitt construction the projected Me-600 would have been a formidable 500 mph fighter.

The odd circular wing already had the Komet pilots making suggestions for a new nickname. They would call any Sack aircraft that made it into combat the “Bussard” (Buzzard)! The name was proposed by the nature of the A.S.6V-1 which didn’t fly much but spent a lot of time on the ground and made out of “scavenged” parts!

But Sack never got the chance to fix the A.S.6V-1 as it was strafed one day and then cut up and dismantled before US troops arrived at Brandis in April 1945. They found no trace of the aircraft.

Type: Experimental aircraft
Wings: Circular shape, AVA Gottingen profile with triangular ailerons
Structure: Wooden
Coating: Plywood
Empennage: Conventional, based on the Klemm Kl 35 ones
Landing gear: Fixed, taken from a Me Bf-108 Taifun with Ju-88 brakes
Engine: Argus As 10C-3, inverted V-8, air-cooled, 240 hp
Propeller: Two wooden blades, 250 cm in diameter
Wingspan: 500 cm
Length: 640 cm
Height: 256 cm
Wing area: 19.62 sq.m
T/O weight: 900 kg
Wingload: 45.87 kg/sq.m