Gotha G.III

The Gotha G.II and G.III bombers made their appearance in 1916. The two bombers were remarkably similar, differing only in their engines and internal details. The G.III entered service in August of 1916 and was powered by two Mercedes D IVa direct drive engines. Engine power went directly to the propeller shaft without using a reduction gear to reduce revolution speed. Both aircraft were armed with two 7.92mm Maxim IMG Parabellum machine guns – one in the nose and another in the aft fuselage – and carried approximately 540kg of bombs. A few G.IIs and G.IIIs were equipped with a trapdoor in the undersurface of the rear fuselage, which permitted the rear gunner to take up a prone position and fire aft or downwards from a ventral position to defend the bomber’s vulnerable ‘blind spot.’

Gotha G.II

The Gotha G.II and G.III bombers made their appearance in 1916. The two bombers were remarkably similar, differing only in their engines and internal details. The G.II entered service in March of 1916 and was powered by a pair of direct drive 164kW six-cylinder liquid-cooled Mercedes DIV engines mounted in a pusher configuration. Some 15 G.IIs were used in the Balkans until they were withdrawn due to unreliable engines.
Both aircraft were armed with two 7.92mm Maxim IMG Parabellum machine guns – one in the nose and another in the aft fuselage – and carried approximately 540kg of bombs. A few G.IIs and G.IIIs were equipped with a trapdoor in the undersurface of the rear fuselage, which permitted the rear gunner to take up a prone position and fire aft or downwards from a ventral position to defend the bomber’s vulnerable ‘blind spot.’
The G.II used straight-eight DIV engines of 220hp, the G.III straight-six DIVa’s with 260hp.
Also the G.II did not have the trap-door, this was on G.IIIs only. Only 10 G.IIs were apparently built.

G II
Engine: 2 x Benz D IV, 165kW
Crew: 3

Gotha Ursinus G.I

The first G.I flew in July 1915 followed by a further 17 of these three seater machines. While the prototype used two 160hp Mercedes D IIIs, the production aircraft employed two 150hp Benz Bz IIIs. mounted on the lower wing. A single Mercedes D.III-engined example of a seaplane version was also completed as the U.W.D. (Ursinus Wasser Doppeldecker, or Oscar Ursinus-designed float biplane).

G.I
Engine: 2 x Benz Bz-III, 110kW
Take-off weight: 2810 kg / 6195 lb
Wingspan: 22.0/19.7 m / 72 ft 2 in / 64 ft 8 in
Length: 12.9 m / 42 ft 4 in
Height: 3.9 m / 12 ft 10 in
Wing area: 82.0 sq.m / 882.64 sq ft
Max. Speed: 130 km/h / 81 mph
Ceiling: 2700 m / 8850 ft
Range w/max.fuel: 540 km / 336 miles
Crew: 3
Armament: 1 machine-gun

Gotha (Gothaer Waggonfabrik Ag)

Operated aircraft works and flying school at Gotha and seaplane school at Warnemunde in First World War. Manufactured large quantities of aircraft during the war, including seaplanes and twin-engine bombers. Closed by Versailles Peace Treaty. Reopened in mid-1930s with two-seat training biplane, Go 145. In Second World War built Bf 109 fighter and Do 17Z bomber, also Go 242 glider and a powered version designated Go 244.

Gotaverken

Sweden
Shipbuilding company, opened an aircraft department for license-construction of Hawker aircraft for Swedish government. Received order for Hart biplanes powered by Swedish-built Pegasus engines in 1935. Subsequently built a few light aircraft of its own design, most notably the GV.38 high-wing monoplane.

Gossamer Albatross

The Albatross had grown out of the Condor’s success but it is in a number of ways a very different craft — utilising carbon fibre reinforced plastic tubing for wing spars, bowsprit and gondola to produce a light, strong structure. The fuselage gondola and flying surfaces are covered by a Mylar plastic film, attached by double-sided adhesive tape with wing ribs cut from expanded polystyrene foam. Its 28.3¬m (93 ft) wing could be broken down into four sections for ease of transport, and had instruments an airspeed sensor driven by a tiny propeller mounted on the foreplane bowsprit, and an ‘altimeter’ developed from the automatic focusing device of a Polaroid camera.
Control of-the aircraft is effected by an all-moving canard and by wing-warping.
This 75 lb aircraft, flown and powered by 140 lb Bryan Allen, conquered the English Channel in 2 hours 49 minutes at a speed of some 11 knots in June 1979. Instrumentation is down to the basics of an airspeed indicator and an altimeter — neither of which proved essential when, in the latter half of the Channel-crossing, flat batteries mean a loss of readings.

Wing span: 93 ft 10 in.

Gossamer Condor II

After the Condor, a new design went together at Shafter, a new base in Central Valley. It was called number two because it represented a major change in some ways. Paul MacCready kept the basic wire-braced tube-structure concept, but aspect ratio was increased from 8.3 to 12.8 and the wing loading raised from 0.22 to 0.26 lbs/sq.ft. A thick, double-surface airfoil was computer-designed and only a single tube along the centre of pressure was used for the spar. By eliminating the rear spar, enough weight was saved to permit use of more closely-spaced ribs and a cardboard leading edge. The pilot’s seat and chain-wheels were enclosed by a streamlined plastic envelope.
The result was that Greg Miller and Tyler MacCready almost immediately doubled their duration times. But making a turn and control of the new machine in bank had yet to be accomplished. Beyond a quarter turn the drag was too high creating reversal at low speeds.
Opposite-action wing warp was one of the final keys to success. The drag of the inner wing (due to its increased angle of attack) swings that wing back, but also adds just enough lift to keep it from dropping. The result – a perfect turn. The pilot just clicks a lever into the notch and the wings are held in a twist for a turn with no other action necessary until the ship is straightened. Then he lifts the lever into neutral and goes his way. The Condor can turn about in only 180 feet. The wings were slightly swept back to aid stability, and the foreplane could be banked and its angle of incidence in¬creased to start a turn, with the innermost wing warped to provide additional lift and thus balance the turn and prevent that damaging slip into the ground which had wrecked previous man powered aircraft.
By the summer of 1977 the Gossamer Condor had made more than 430 flights and had accumulated more time in the air than all previous man powered aircraft com¬bined.
On 23rd August 1977, for the 223rd flight, in ideal conditions with a windspeed of less than 2 knots, Bryan Allen made a 30ft take-off run toward the north pylon on Shafter Airport runway. After a 500ft cruise Bryan cleared the Tee bar on the start line and observer Bill Richardson clicked his stopwatch. Bryan was soon into the first, right turn after 250 more feet and he made a 425ft diameter 180 degree sweep around the marker to head for the south pylon, 2,640ft away. It was a smooth cruise of almost three minutes, then another sweeping left turn to re-trace his course back northwards. As he neared the original take-off point, eager followers yelled encouragement and with one last effort Bryan took the Condor over the Tee bar to finish at precisely 6:22.5. He had traced an almost perfect figure eight, the flightpaths 9ft 7in. apart on the start/finish line and met all the conditions of the famous contest.
On 31st December 1977, Gossamer Condor was aired for the last time before moving across the USA to be hung in the Smithsonian Institute at Washington DC. Rough weather over Christmas almost prevented this ‘last fling’ but fate decreed a dead calm end to the momentous year.
Less than a month after the Gossamer Condor’s record-setting flight, the manpowered airplane was flown by Maude Oldershaw whose husband was the Condor’s mechanic.
The Gossamer Condor, winner of the Kremer Prize for man-powered flight, in 1978 was being moved to the National Air and Space Museum, in Washington, D.C.

Aspect ratio 12.8.
Height 18 ft.
Length 30 ft.
Span: 96 ft.
Wing area: 760 sq.ft.
Canard area: 93 sq.ft.

Gossamer Condor I

In 1976 Paul MacCready was thinking about trying for the £50,000 Kremer Prize for manpowered flight. The wing loading would be very light and that it would operate a lift coefficient of only .9 (compared to 1.4, or better, for previous MPAs). This meant a single-surface airfoil would have low drag.
Construction began in the Rose Parade float shed down in the Arroyo Seco not far from Pasadena. Two inch diameter .035in. thick alloy tubes in 12ft sections that were joined to make an 88ft span wing.
On 9th October 1976, though the lightly misting rain added a lot of weight, the craft acted more like a balloon than an airplane. They walked with it at 5 mph; it lifted easily and strained at the ropes attached to all corners. Nothing broke. The structural idea was reasonable.
The 96ft span craft was moved to Mojave Airport soon after the tubing was chemically milled down from 22 thousandths at the centre to 14 thousandths of an inch at the outer sections of the wing.
First flights with Paul’s son Tyler (a hang glider pilot) on board were promising. Tyler pedalled rather easily making 45-second flights with a push start. Greg Miller, a new rider of racing cyclist championship quality could take off on his own and, after a good deal of flying practice, made a tremendously encouraging flight of two-and-a-half minutes while covering over a thousand foot distance.

The next time, MacCready measured and marked the one-mile figure-eight course, practised taking off and flying over the 10 ft barrier, and called out the officials. After several trials, Greg’s best flight was 2 minutes and 30 seconds. It had to stay up three times longer, and the matter of control was even more critical – a full turn had yet to be made. Winds of 2 to 4 mph and the slightest gustiness would limit flights to only 30 or 40 seconds. Thin, single-surface airfbils have low drag at only one angle of attack. For the Condor, a low-drag spike occurred at about 8.2 mph. Above or below that speed, the drag rose impossibly high.
The Condor I conducted 332 flights.

With budgetary problems NASA was having trying to keep its space program alive and well, NASA/ Dryden Flight Research Center established a NASA test program is to study the unusual aerodynamic performance, stability and control characteristics of large but very lightly-loaded and slow-flying aircraft. Data acquired will be used in the design of future aircraft for extremely low-speed flight at any altitude, and particularly for low-power flight in very low densities at high altitudes up to 100,000 feet. Not that they expect Bryan to crank his way into the stratosphere – they just wonder what it would be like to f ly a homebuilt aircraft like the G.A. in the thin air of Mars.
Under Project Manager Dale Reed, in mid February 1980 the 55-pound man-powered aircraft finally got off the ground, between midwinter rains, with Bryan Atlen doing the legwork.
When the rains let up, they hooked up an electric motor and to make it an EPA (electric powered aircraft), preparatory to installing solar cells on the wings.

Aspect ratio: 8.3.
Span: 96 ft.
Chord: 115 in.
Wing area: 1056 sq.ft.
Prop dia: 12 ft.
Weight: 84 lb