A series of experimental types appeared in the 1930s, including the Ki-19 mid-wing twin-engine bomber.
Monoplane
Nakajima Ki-12
A series of experimental types appeared in the 1930s, including the Ki-12 low-wing monoplane with retractable landing gear.
Nagoya-Sento Ki-001 BEN

Confusion over pre-war Japanese fighters was so complex many fictional or misidentified types received code names.
After the Pearl Harbor attack military intelligence gathered every piece of downed Japanese aircraft they could find. From that operation they came up with this aircraft. They found a manufacturing plate with the words Nogoya Sento, they thought that was a manufacturer, it was a plant location. From the wings and tail group, it looks like they found parts of an Aichi type 99 Val.
Given the allied code name ‘BEN’ after one of the 5th Air Force Intelligence officers, the code was dropped in less than a year.
It was 1943 before the war department figured out there was no such a plane.
Mylius MY-104
Mylius Flugzeugwerk Gmbh & Co Kg marketed the single-seat MY-102 aerobatic and towing aircraft, two-seat MY-103 in Standard and Basic Trainer variants, and four-seat MY-104 for touring, IFR training and other uses. All are low-wing monoplanes based on a common modular design, with interchangeable sub-structures.
Mylius MY-103
Mylius Flugzeugwerk Gmbh & Co Kg marketed the single-seat MY-102 aerobatic and towing aircraft, two-seat MY-103 in Standard and Basic Trainer variants, and four-seat MY-104 for touring, IFR training and other uses. All are low-wing monoplanes based on a common modular design, with interchangeable sub-structures.
Mylius MY-102
Mylius Flugzeugwerk Gmbh & Co Kg marketed the single-seat MY-102 aerobatic and towing aircraft, two-seat MY-103 in Standard and Basic Trainer variants, and four-seat MY-104 for touring, IFR training and other uses. All are low-wing monoplanes based on a common modular design, with interchangeable sub-structures.
Myasishchev M-201-M

One other version of the M-4 ‘Bison’ is known, a test-bed aircraft powered by four D-15 turbojet engines each of 13000kg thrust and designated 201-M.
This was used in September 1959 to establish a number of payload-to-height records by lifting a payload of 10,000 kg (22,046 lb) to 50,253 ft (15,317 m) and the weight of 55,220 kg (121,480 lb) to 2000 m (6,561 ft).
Myasishchev M-17 Stratosfera / M-55 Geophysics

Originally identified in 1982 by US reconnaissance satellites as the ‘Ram-M’ single-seat high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft, and later codenamed ‘Mystic’ by NATO, the twin-boom straight-wing jet, was publicised as a high-altitude research aircraft able to carry around 1500kg of sensors, existing in two versions.
The first of two prototype aircraft, designated M-17 Stratosfera (‘Mystic-A’), first flew in 1988 and are powered by a single 68.6kN thrust Rybinsk RD-36-51V turbojet developed from the Tu-144 SST powerplant.
The M-55 Geofizika (‘Mystic-B’), has two 49kN thrust Perm/Soloviev PS-30-V12 turbojets mounted side-by-side behind a raised cockpit installed in a longer nose, together with a reduced span wing.
The M-55 ‘Mystic-B’ differs from the first M-17 Stratosfera in having a longer jetpipe, shorter engine intakes, a reprofiled nose and an undernose FLIR turret.
The role of the ‘Mystic-B’ is described as environmental sampling missions or high-altitude research and endurance in this role is claimed as over 4 hours loiter capability at 20000m. A further variant of the M-55 is reported to be under development with wingroot mounted engines in stalled in a conventional fuselage carrying a sweptback tail unit.
Two ‘Mystic-A’ prototypes were followed by two ‘Mystic-B’ and two pre-production ‘Mystic-Bs’ were flying by 1992.

Engines: 2 x Soloviev PS-30-V12, 49kN
Wingspan: 37.47 m / 122 ft 11 in
Length: 22.87 m / 75 ft 0 in
Height: 4.83 m / 15 ft 10 in
Cruise speed: 750 km/h / 466 mph
Ceiling: 21000 m / 68900 ft
Crew: 1

Myasishchev VM-T Atlant

After directing CAHI (TsAGI) from 1960, Myasishchev returned to OKB No 23 in early 1978 in order to study how a 3M strategic bomber might be modified to convey large space launchers and similar payloads. In particular an aircraft was needed to transport to the Baikonur launch site four kinds of load: the nose of the Energiya launcher; the second portion of Energiya; the Energiya tank; and the Buran spacecraft, with vertical tail and engines removed. These loads typically weighed 40 tonnes and had a diameter of 8m. Myasishchev had previously calculated that such loads could be flown mounted above a modified 3M bomber. He died on 14th October 1978, the programme being continued by V Fedotov. While design went ahead, three 3M tanker aircraft were taken to SibNIA (the Siberian State Research Instiutute named for S.A.Chaplygin) and put through a detailed structural audit preparatory to grafting on a new rear fuselage and tail, and mountings for the external payload. The modified aircraft were designated 3M-T. All were rebuilt with zero-life airframes and new engines, but initially without payload attachments. One was static-tested at CAHI while the other two were completed and flown, tne first on 29th April 1981. After a brief flight-test programme they were equipped to carry pick-a-back payloads, and in Myasishchev’s honour redesignated VM-T Atlant. The first flight with a payload was made by A.Kucherenko and crew on 6th January 1982. Subsequently the two Atlant aircraft carried more than 150 payloads to Baikonur.
The most obvious modification of these aircraft was that the rear fuselage was replaced by a new structure 7m longer and with an upward tilt, carrying a completely new tail. This comprised modified tailplanes and elevators with pronounced dihedral carrying inward- sloping fins and rudders of almost perfectly rectangular shape, with increased total area and outside the turbulent wake from any of the envisaged payloads. Less obvious was the fact that, even though the maximum take-off weight was less than that for the bomber versions, the airframe was strengthened throughout.
As time between overhauls was not of great importance the original four VD-7B engines were replaced by the VD-7M. These were RD-7M-2 engines, originally built for the Tu-22 supersonic bomber with afterburners and variable nozzles, which had had the afterburner replaced by a plain jetpipe and fixed-area nozzle. Thrust was 11,000kg. These were in turn replaced by the VD-7D, rated at 10,750kg. Each aircraft was fitted with 14 attachment points above the fuselage and on lateral rear-fuselage blisters for the four different kinds of supporting structure, each being specially tailored to its payload. They were also equipped with a modified flight-control and autopilot system. The forward fuselage was furnished with work stations for a crew of six.
The aircraft were given civilian paint schemes, one being registered RF-01502 and the other being RF-01402 and fitted with a flight-refuelling probe. To support their missions the PKU-50 loading and unloading facility was constructed at spacecraft factories, including NPO Energiya at Moscow Khimki, and at the Baikonur Cosmodrome. These incorporated a giant gantry for carefully placing the payloads on the carrier aircraft. Despite the turbulent aerodynamics downstream of the external payloads, this dramatic reconstruction proved completely successful.
Max take-off weight: 136400 kg / 300712 lb
Max. speed: 600 km/h / 373 mph
Cruise speed: 540 km/h / 336 mph
Ceiling: 9500 m / 31150 ft
Range w/max.fuel: 3000 km / 1864 miles
Range w/max.payload: 1500 km / 932 miles
Crew: 6
Myasishchev M-50 / M-52 / Bounder

To succeed its M-4, Myasishchyev produced the M-50, codenamed ‘Bounder’ by NATO.
It was based on a very long area-ruled fuselage with two four-wheel main landing gear bogies arranged in tandem to retract into the lower fuselage. This was basically the same arrangement as that used in the M-4, as was the use of two twin-wheel stabilizers of the outrigger type that retracted aft into the wingtips. The cropped delta wing was located in the shoulder position with its leading edges swept at 500 inboard decreasing to 41030’ outboard. The tail unit was conventional for a supersonic type, with powered all-moving slab tailplane halves and a fin with a powered rudder.
The crew of three was accommodated in a pressurized nose compartment on tandem ejector seats behind a V-shaped windscreen whose contours were continued aft of the cockpit by a long dorsal spine stretching as far as the extreme tail. In the first aeroplane the four engines were located on pylons under the wing leading edges. Power was provided by four Soloviev D-15 turbo-jets of 13000kg thrust.

First flight dates between 1957 and 1961 have been quoted, and it is believed that a maximum speed in the order of Mach 1.8 was achieved. By the standards of the day this was a good figure, but the range of 3730 miles (6000 km) without payload was poor. It was seen at the 1961 Soviet Aviation Day display.
The last of several prototypes, generally known as the M-52, had a different powerplant arrangement: the two inboard engines remained on underwing pylons. The M-52 was powered by four Kolesov ND-7F or VD-7F turbojets, with an afterburning thrust of 18145kg. The two outboard engines remained non-afterburning units but were arranged on pylons with forward-swept leading edges projecting horizontally from the cropped tips of the delta wings. The M-50/M-52 series failed to progress past the prototype stage. The Bounder was intended to carry a weapons load of up to 20,000kg.

M.50
Engines: 2 x 14500kg Kolesov VD-7F and 2 x 12260kg VD-7 turbojets
Wingspan: 37.0 m / 121 ft 5 in
Length: 57.0 m / 187 ft 0 in
Height: 12.0 m / 39 ft 4 in
Wing area: 282.0 sq.m / 3035.42 sq ft
Max take-off weight: 200000 kg / 440927 lb
Empty weight: 74500 kg / 164245 lb
Max. speed: 1053 kts / 1950 km/h / 1212 mph
Cruise speed: 1500 km/h / 932 mph
Ceiling: 20000 m / 65600 ft
Range w/max.fuel: 6000 km / 3728 miles
Armament: 20000kg of bombs and missiles
Crew: 2
